Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Two Linear Programs are Better than One
arXiv:2610.15909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The extension complexity $\operatorname{xc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that projects onto it. Motivated by the complexity of neural networks, Hertrich and Loho introduced the virtual extension complexity $\operatorname{vxc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$, which is the minimum of $\operatorname{xc}(Q) + \operatorname{xc}(R)$ among all polytopes $Q$ and $R$ such that $P+Q=R$. We show the following results pertaining to virtual extension complexity. First, we resolve the core open problem on the topic by showing the virtual extension complexity can be exponentially smaller than extension complexity. Second, we show there are matroid base polytopes with exponential virtual extension complexity by adapting a semi-algebraic counting argument by Hrube\v{s} that extends the counting arguments of Rothvoss. Finally, we show that the maximum virtual extension complexity of a polygon with $n$ vertices is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$. This resolves an analogue of a question on extension complexity of Fiorini, Rothvoss, and Tiwary in 2011 in the case of virtual extension complexity.
Abstract:The extension complexity $\operatorname{xc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that projects onto it. Motivated by the complexity of neural networks, Hertrich and Loho introduced the virtual extension complexity $\operatorname{vxc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$, which is the minimum of $\operatorname{xc}(Q) + \operatorname{xc}(R)$ among all polytopes $Q$ and $R$ such that $P+Q=R$. We show the following results pertaining to virtual extension complexity. First, we resolve the core open problem on the topic by showing the virtual extension complexity can be exponentially smaller than extension complexity. Second, we show there are matroid base polytopes with exponential virtual extension complexity by adapting a semi-algebraic counting argument by Hrubeš that extends the counting arguments of Rothvoss. Finally, we show that the maximum virtual extension complexity of a polygon with $n$ vertices is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$. This resolves an analogue of a question on extension complexity of Fiorini, Rothvoss, and Tiwary in 2011 in the case of virtual extension complexity.
Combinatorics (math.CO); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.15909 [math.CO]
(or arXiv:2610.15909v1 [math.CO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15909 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

[AINews] Here are 6 Clones of Jev in 2 days
Latent Space · Sep 19, 2026
Under Violet
LessWrong · Jun 10, 2026