aiqbench analysis
This study exposes how measurement artifacts, particularly annotator bias and output length, distort performance rankings in multilingual affective generation benchmarks. By proposing a reference-based probe called emoji-affect decodability, the authors demonstrate that current leaderboards are unstable and do not reflect genuine system capabilities. The findings urge the research community to adopt more robust evaluation metrics that isolate true model properties from experimental noise.
Two Emojis of Difference: What Multilingual Affective Generation Benchmarks Actually Measure
arXiv:2609.29445v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We audit a multilingual affective generation benchmark eight instruction-tuned LLMs producing emoji summaries for 17,100 Bangla, English and Hindi sentences, with 6,960 human judgements and find its headline conclusions to be artefacts of the measurement instrument rather than properties of the systems. Treating annotators as a random rather than a fixed factor, no system differs significantly from any other ($F(7,14)=0.59$, $p=0.76$), although the conventional analysis declares 19 of 28 pairwise differences significant. Annotator identity explains far more rating variance than system identity, and the winning system changes whenever any single annotator is removed. The ordering that does emerge tracks output length: mean emoji count explains 78.7\% of between-system variance, and a within-item length-matched comparison over 2,599 pairs reverses the leaderboard. We further show that cross-provider anisotropy differences vanish under mean-centring, that per-language token costs change sign with the normalising unit, and that multi-view row-wise splits inflate macro-F1 by $3.1$ points and change the top-ranked system. In place of preference scoring we propose **emoji-affect decodability**, a reference-based probe whose rankings are stable to $\pm0.003$ macro-F1 across seeds.
Abstract:We audit a multilingual affective generation benchmark eight instruction-tuned LLMs producing emoji summaries for 17,100 Bangla, English and Hindi sentences, with 6,960 human judgements and find its headline conclusions to be artefacts of the measurement instrument rather than properties of the systems. Treating annotators as a random rather than a fixed factor, no system differs significantly from any other ($F(7,14)=0.59$, $p=0.76$), although the conventional analysis declares 19 of 28 pairwise differences significant. Annotator identity explains far more rating variance than system identity, and the winning system changes whenever any single annotator is removed. The ordering that does emerge tracks output length: mean emoji count explains 78.7\% of between-system variance, and a within-item length-matched comparison over 2,599 pairs reverses the leaderboard. We further show that cross-provider anisotropy differences vanish under mean-centring, that per-language token costs change sign with the normalising unit, and that multi-view row-wise splits inflate macro-F1 by $3.1$ points and change the top-ranked system. In place of preference scoring we propose **emoji-affect decodability**, a reference-based probe whose rankings are stable to $\pm0.003$ macro-F1 across seeds.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.29445 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.29445v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29445 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words
Related coverage

Introducing Mistral OCR 4
Mistral AI · Jun 23, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026

Tiny Aya in the wild: What people are building with open multilingual AI
Cohere · Jul 14, 2026

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 2, 2026