aiqbench analysis
TrueMuse establishes a rigorous benchmark for evaluating data attribution in text-to-music models by providing controlled ground truth via fine-tuned diffusion systems. The study reveals significant variability in current black-box methods across different attribute settings, underscoring the need for more robust techniques to quantify training sample contributions. This work directly addresses a critical gap in assessing model transparency and copyright implications within generative audio AI.
TrueMuse: A Benchmark for Data Attribution in Text-to-Music Models
arXiv:2610.00835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-music generation models are trained on massive music collections, creating a growing need for data attribution methods that can quantify the contribution of individual training samples. However, existing attribution methods are difficult to rigorously evaluate due to the lack of reliable ground truth, making it challenging to reliably assess their actual effectiveness. To address this gap, we introduce TrueMuse, a controlled dataset and benchmark for text-to-music data attribution. TrueMuse is constructed by fine-tuning three diffusion-based text-to-music models on carefully curated attribution samples, whose known inclusion in fine-tuning provides controlled attribution targets for evaluation. The benchmark covers four attribution settings, spanning melodic structure, timbral characteristics, artist-level stylistic signatures, and genre-level shared patterns, and includes 133 attributes, 648 fine-tuned models, and 95,456 generated samples across two prompt types. Using TrueMuse, we systematically evaluate existing black-box attribution methods along four dimensions: fine-tuning improvement, prompt-type difficulty, multi-task training, and fine-tuning data size. Our results show that attribution remains challenging, with existing methods exhibiting substantial variation across evaluation settings, highlighting the need for more reliable and generalizable attribution methods for text-to-music generation. Code and Dataset will be released upon acceptance.
Abstract:Text-to-music generation models are trained on massive music collections, creating a growing need for data attribution methods that can quantify the contribution of individual training samples. However, existing attribution methods are difficult to rigorously evaluate due to the lack of reliable ground truth, making it challenging to reliably assess their actual effectiveness. To address this gap, we introduce TrueMuse, a controlled dataset and benchmark for text-to-music data attribution. TrueMuse is constructed by fine-tuning three diffusion-based text-to-music models on carefully curated attribution samples, whose known inclusion in fine-tuning provides controlled attribution targets for evaluation. The benchmark covers four attribution settings, spanning melodic structure, timbral characteristics, artist-level stylistic signatures, and genre-level shared patterns, and includes 133 attributes, 648 fine-tuned models, and 95,456 generated samples across two prompt types. Using TrueMuse, we systematically evaluate existing black-box attribution methods along four dimensions: fine-tuning improvement, prompt-type difficulty, multi-task training, and fine-tuning data size. Our results show that attribution remains challenging, with existing methods exhibiting substantial variation across evaluation settings, highlighting the need for more reliable and generalizable attribution methods for text-to-music generation. Code and Dataset will be released upon acceptance.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.00835 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.00835v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00835 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage
FIGMA: Towards FIne-Grained Music retrievAl
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

100 things we announced at I/O 2026
Google · May 20, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026