Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes Trident, a three-level memory hierarchy for fault-tolerant quantum computers that reduces the cost of verifying qubit loads from high-density storage. Its reported speedups of 2.8× and 4.2× come from simulated architecture comparisons, not hardware, and the paper claims only a 4.9% increase in physical qubit cost. For quantum readers, the main point is that architectural overhead, not just code design, is becoming a bottleneck for practical fault-tolerant machines.
Source coveringarXiv

Trident: Efficient Load Verification for Yoked Surface Codes using a Three-Level Memory Hierarchy

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.32152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers (FTQCs) commonly use the surface code to encode program qubits as error-corrected logical qubits. Unfortunately, the surface code has a poor encoding rate, so recent work has proposed Yoked Surface Codes (YSCs), which concatenate the surface code with a high-rate quantum code. The surface code qubits in YSCs are protected by the checks, or yokes, of the high-rate code. YSCs have 1D and 2D variants, which are $1.8\times$ and $4.5\times$ more efficient than the surface code, respectively. Modern FTQC architectures use a two-level hierarchy: surface codes perform logical operations (compute) while 2D YSCs store idle program qubits (memory). To load a qubit from memory, the FTQC first performs retrieval, which logically moves a program qubit from a 2D YSC into a surface code (8 cycles). However, retrieval is not fault-tolerant, so the FTQC must verify the load by measuring all the yokes of the 2D YSC (178 cycles). As verification dominates memory access latency, eliminating it can provide a speedup of $5.7\times$. Our goal is to reduce the verification overhead of 2D YSCs while retaining their storage efficiency. We exploit the fact that 1D YSCs, though less storage-efficient, incur negligible verification latency. We propose Trident, which expands the two-level hierarchy into a three-level hierarchy by adding a small intermediate level containing a 1D YSC (L1). If most loads hit L1 rather than L2 (2D YSC tier), it can significantly reduce verification overhead. We present two variants: Trident-D (demand-driven) and Trident-P (prefetch-driven), which achieve speedups of $2.8\times$ and $4.2\times$, respectively, while increasing the physical qubit cost of memory by only 4.9%.

Abstract:Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers (FTQCs) commonly use the surface code to encode program qubits as error-corrected logical qubits. Unfortunately, the surface code has a poor encoding rate, so recent work has proposed Yoked Surface Codes (YSCs), which concatenate the surface code with a high-rate quantum code. The surface code qubits in YSCs are protected by the checks, or yokes, of the high-rate code. YSCs have 1D and 2D variants, which are $1.8\times$ and $4.5\times$ more efficient than the surface code, respectively. Modern FTQC architectures use a two-level hierarchy: surface codes perform logical operations (compute) while 2D YSCs store idle program qubits (memory). To load a qubit from memory, the FTQC first performs retrieval, which logically moves a program qubit from a 2D YSC into a surface code (8 cycles). However, retrieval is not fault-tolerant, so the FTQC must verify the load by measuring all the yokes of the 2D YSC (178 cycles). As verification dominates memory access latency, eliminating it can provide a speedup of $5.7\times$. Our goal is to reduce the verification overhead of 2D YSCs while retaining their storage efficiency. We exploit the fact that 1D YSCs, though less storage-efficient, incur negligible verification latency. We propose Trident, which expands the two-level hierarchy into a three-level hierarchy by adding a small intermediate level containing a 1D YSC (L1). If most loads hit L1 rather than L2 (2D YSC tier), it can significantly reduce verification overhead. We present two variants: Trident-D (demand-driven) and Trident-P (prefetch-driven), which achieve speedups of $2.8\times$ and $4.2\times$, respectively, while increasing the physical qubit cost of memory by only 4.9%.

arXiv:2610.32152 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.32152v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32152 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1145/3845814.3850031 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 364 words