aiqbench analysis
TreeProbe introduces a critical benchmark for evaluating how large language models handle the distinct theoretical framework of Tibetan medicine. The study reveals significant "external ontology drift," where current AI systems default to dominant biomedical or TCM reasoning rather than accurately representing native epistemic structures. This work is essential for developing medically inclusive LLMs that avoid distorting traditional knowledge systems during inference.
TreeProbe : A Tibetan Medicine Benchmark for Cultural Bias in LLMs
arXiv:2608.00640v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly viewed as a potential means of mitigating global health inequities, yet their outputs often reflect dominant high-resource medical traditions and provide limited coverage of traditional medical knowledge systems. Tibetan medicine, one of the world's four major traditional medical systems, has an independent and highly structured theoretical framework. When models lack grounded understanding of Tibetan medicine, they may fall back on dominant epistemic systems and distort the native knowledge structure during reasoning. However, quantitative tools for evaluating cultural bias in Tibetan medicine remain largely absent. To address this gap, we introduce TreeProbe, the first cultural-bias benchmark organized around the native Tree of Medicine framework in Tibetan medicine. It contains 4,719 expert-adjudicated items covering 467 diseases and 10 subtasks along the three roots. Experiments on representative LLMs show that current models remain limited in native Tibetan medical contexts and exhibit systematic external ontology drift. Further analysis reveals that models diverge in whether they drift toward biomedical or TCM reasoning, shaped by pretraining data composition and surface resemblance between TCM and Tibetan medicine. TreeProbe provides a diagnostic benchmark for developing medical AI systems that are both linguistically inclusive and epistemically fair. Code and data are available in an anonymous repository at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TreeProbe/.
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly viewed as a potential means of mitigating global health inequities, yet their outputs often reflect dominant high-resource medical traditions and provide limited coverage of traditional medical knowledge systems. Tibetan medicine, one of the world's four major traditional medical systems, has an independent and highly structured theoretical framework. When models lack grounded understanding of Tibetan medicine, they may fall back on dominant epistemic systems and distort the native knowledge structure during reasoning. However, quantitative tools for evaluating cultural bias in Tibetan medicine remain largely absent. To address this gap, we introduce TreeProbe, the first cultural-bias benchmark organized around the native Tree of Medicine framework in Tibetan medicine. It contains 4,719 expert-adjudicated items covering 467 diseases and 10 subtasks along the three roots. Experiments on representative LLMs show that current models remain limited in native Tibetan medical contexts and exhibit systematic external ontology drift. Further analysis reveals that models diverge in whether they drift toward biomedical or TCM reasoning, shaped by pretraining data composition and surface resemblance between TCM and Tibetan medicine. TreeProbe provides a diagnostic benchmark for developing medical AI systems that are both linguistically inclusive and epistemically fair. Code and data are available in an anonymous repository at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.00640 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.00640v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00640 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 301 words
Related coverage
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026
Camellia: Benchmarking Cultural Biases in LLMs for Asian Languages
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026