Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces Padyam2Gadyam, a dataset designed to evaluate Large Language Models on the nuanced task of translating classical Telugu poetry into modern prose. The study reveals that while general-purpose LLMs outperform traditional machine translation systems, both approaches face significant challenges in generating and evaluating faithful prose translations across languages. This work highlights critical gaps in current AI capabilities when handling low-resource literary domains and complex stylistic constraints.
Sources coveringarXiv, Fortune
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Translating Classical Poetry into Modern Prose

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.02806v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We built a dataset for the task of poem-to-prose translation from 13th-17th Century Telugu classical poetry to contemporary Telugu and English prose, which we call Padyam2Gadyam. The dataset consists of 600 poems and their human-verified Telugu and English prose translations. We evaluated 2 machine translation systems and 5 contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to do zero-shot poem-to-prose translation into Telugu and English using this dataset. Our results indicate that while the general purpose LLMs are better than the machine translation systems, there are systematic issues with the generation and evaluation of prose translation in both languages across systems.

Abstract:We built a dataset for the task of poem-to-prose translation from 13th-17th Century Telugu classical poetry to contemporary Telugu and English prose, which we call Padyam2Gadyam. The dataset consists of 600 poems and their human-verified Telugu and English prose translations. We evaluated 2 machine translation systems and 5 contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to do zero-shot poem-to-prose translation into Telugu and English using this dataset. Our results indicate that while the general purpose LLMs are better than the machine translation systems, there are systematic issues with the generation and evaluation of prose translation in both languages across systems.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2606.02806 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.02806v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02806 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 194 words

Related coverage