aiqbench analysis
This study resolves the theoretical debate regarding hydrogen tunneling in niobium by demonstrating that the process is fundamentally nonadiabatic and collective, rather than separable between the light particle and the host lattice. The findings have direct implications for understanding defect-induced decoherence in superconducting qubits, a critical bottleneck for quantum computing scalability. By establishing a practical criterion to assess adiabaticity limits, this work provides a more robust microscopic framework for modeling quantum systems involving light interstitials.
Transition-state lattice modes and the breakdown of adiabatic tunneling for hydrogen and deuterium in bcc Nb
arXiv:2605.23212v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Interstitial hydrogen and deuterium in body-centered-cubic metals constitute archetypal quantum tunneling systems. Their relevance has been renewed by the connection between hydrogenic tunneling in Nb and defect-induced decoherence in superconducting qubits, motivating a predictive microscopic theory. Existing theoretical treatments invoke an adiabatic separation between the light interstitial and the host lattice, an assumption whose validity has not been rigorously established for hydrogenic species. Here, we show that the experimentally measured tunnel splittings of O-trapped H and D in bcc Nb are quantitatively well-described within a five-dimensional (5D) Lattice-Renormalized Born-Oppenheimer (LRBO) framework. This approach treats three interstitial modes and two judiciously selected lattice modes, which includes a transition-state mode, on equal quantum footing. By recasting nested Born-Oppenheimer hierarchies within this same formalism and benchmarking against modern \textit{ab initio} potential energy surfaces, we show that adiabatic separation of the light particle from lattice dynamics is satisfied only in the positive-muon ($\mu^{+}$) mass limit. In contrast, tunneling for H and D is fundamentally a collective, nonadiabatic process mediated by anharmonic lattice couplings. Finally, we show that the breakdown of adiabaticity can be anticipated from simple energy estimates involving the ground-state light-particle energy evaluated at a small number of fixed lattice configurations, providing a practical criterion for assessing the validity of adiabatic tunneling theories in other systems.
Abstract:Interstitial hydrogen and deuterium in body-centered-cubic metals constitute archetypal quantum tunneling systems. Their relevance has been renewed by the connection between hydrogenic tunneling in Nb and defect-induced decoherence in superconducting qubits, motivating a predictive microscopic theory. Existing theoretical treatments invoke an adiabatic separation between the light interstitial and the host lattice, an assumption whose validity has not been rigorously established for hydrogenic species. Here, we show that the experimentally measured tunnel splittings of O-trapped H and D in bcc Nb are quantitatively well-described within a five-dimensional (5D) Lattice-Renormalized Born-Oppenheimer (LRBO) framework. This approach treats three interstitial modes and two judiciously selected lattice modes, which includes a transition-state mode, on equal quantum footing. By recasting nested Born-Oppenheimer hierarchies within this same formalism and benchmarking against modern \textit{ab initio} potential energy surfaces, we show that adiabatic separation of the light particle from lattice dynamics is satisfied only in the positive-muon ($\mu^{+}$) mass limit. In contrast, tunneling for H and D is fundamentally a collective, nonadiabatic process mediated by anharmonic lattice couplings. Finally, we show that the breakdown of adiabaticity can be anticipated from simple energy estimates involving the ground-state light-particle energy evaluated at a small number of fixed lattice configurations, providing a practical criterion for assessing the validity of adiabatic tunneling theories in other systems.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
arXiv:2605.23212 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2605.23212v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23212 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage
Quantum Metrology via Adiabatic Control of Topological Edge States
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026
Michelle Simmons, The Physicist Behind Australia’s First Quantum Computing Company
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026
Action on the Sphere: An Interfering Mean-Field Propagator for the Bose-Hubbard Dimer
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Exponential Symmetry Creates a ‘Disorder-Free Quantum Glass
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 31, 2026