aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical challenge of preserving reinforcement learning improvements when transferring knowledge from a powerful teacher model to a smaller student via on-policy distillation. The authors demonstrate that transfer is structured rather than scalar, introducing TS-OPD which dynamically routes training problems and applies token gating based on joint success metrics to maximize student gains. These findings offer a concrete methodological advance for optimizing reasoning capabilities in resource-constrained models without relying solely on teacher strength.
Transfer-Stratified On-Policy Distillation for RL-Improved Reasoning Teachers
arXiv:2610.05974v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning can substantially improve a reasoning teacher, but it is unclear which of those improvements survive when the teacher supervises a smaller on-policy student. We study this question in mathematical reasoning by comparing teacher lineages before and after GRPO, multiple student scales, direct GRPO, and several on-policy distillation objectives. The central finding is that transfer is structured rather than scalar: teacher strength alone does not make dense distillation competitive, while an RL-improved teacher creates useful but metric-dependent student gains. This motivates Transfer-Stratified On-Policy Distillation (TS-OPD), which screens training problems by the joint sampled success of the student and teacher, routes acquisition problems to gated forward KL, routes consolidation problems to gated reverse KL, and adds an entropy brake to protect sampled coverage. Across the main comparison, TS-OPD is the strongest student objective for macro average correctness with the GRPO-improved teacher, while pass@K remains more mixed. Ablations show that the gains come from routing and token gating rather than skipping problems. These results support a transfer-aware view of OPD: stronger teachers help when the supervision direction and token budget match the student's observed ability, not merely because the teacher endpoint is stronger.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning can substantially improve a reasoning teacher, but it is unclear which of those improvements survive when the teacher supervises a smaller on-policy student. We study this question in mathematical reasoning by comparing teacher lineages before and after GRPO, multiple student scales, direct GRPO, and several on-policy distillation objectives. The central finding is that transfer is structured rather than scalar: teacher strength alone does not make dense distillation competitive, while an RL-improved teacher creates useful but metric-dependent student gains. This motivates Transfer-Stratified On-Policy Distillation (TS-OPD), which screens training problems by the joint sampled success of the student and teacher, routes acquisition problems to gated forward KL, routes consolidation problems to gated reverse KL, and adds an entropy brake to protect sampled coverage. Across the main comparison, TS-OPD is the strongest student objective for macro average correctness with the GRPO-improved teacher, while pass@K remains more mixed. Ablations show that the gains come from routing and token gating rather than skipping problems. These results support a transfer-aware view of OPD: stronger teachers help when the supervision direction and token budget match the student's observed ability, not merely because the teacher endpoint is stronger.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.05974 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.05974v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05974 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage
Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026
SimpleOPD: Simple Tokenizer-Agnostic On-Policy Distillation for Long-Context Reasoning
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026
Learning from the Near Future: Temporal Self-Distillation for RLVR
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Beyond Imitation: Reflective On-Policy Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026