Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies distinct error propagation mechanisms in Transformer training, revealing that forward-pass faults on Q/K paths cause persistent deviations while backward-pass issues depend on gradient exponent distributions. The proposed TrainSDC framework addresses these specific vulnerabilities through targeted recomputation and monitoring, achieving near-fault-free execution with minimal runtime overhead. By moving beyond uniform protection strategies, this work offers a critical advancement in ensuring the reliability of large-scale LLM training pipelines against silent data corruption.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, AI Alignment Forum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

TrainSDC: Characterizing and Mitigating Silent Data Corruption in Large Language Model Training

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.30769v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM training is increasingly vulnerable to silent data corruption (SDC), yet existing protection methods largely treat Transformer computations uniformly because their vulnerability remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic characterization of SDC vulnerability across major computation interfaces in both the forward and backward passes of Transformer training. Our analysis reveals two distinct error propagation mechanisms: forward-pass vulnerability is highly location dependent, with faults on the Q/K path producing persistent training deviations, whereas backward-pass vulnerability is largely governed by gradient exponent distributions rather than computation locations. Motivated by these observations, we propose TrainSDC, a characterization-guided protection framework consisting of Q/K-path recomputation, residual-gain monitoring, and exponent-aware gradient scaling. Experiments on Llama 3.2-1B and Qwen3-0.6B show that TrainSDC maintains training behavior close to fault-free execution under both sparse and dense fault injection while introducing only 1.65%-6.76% runtime overhead.

Abstract:LLM training is increasingly vulnerable to silent data corruption (SDC), yet existing protection methods largely treat Transformer computations uniformly because their vulnerability remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic characterization of SDC vulnerability across major computation interfaces in both the forward and backward passes of Transformer training. Our analysis reveals two distinct error propagation mechanisms: forward-pass vulnerability is highly location dependent, with faults on the Q/K path producing persistent training deviations, whereas backward-pass vulnerability is largely governed by gradient exponent distributions rather than computation locations. Motivated by these observations, we propose TrainSDC, a characterization-guided protection framework consisting of Q/K-path recomputation, residual-gain monitoring, and exponent-aware gradient scaling. Experiments on Llama 3.2-1B and Qwen3-0.6B show that TrainSDC maintains training behavior close to fault-free execution under both sparse and dense fault injection while introducing only 1.65%-6.76% runtime overhead.

12 pages, 5 figures, and 6 tables. Includes an appendix with additional experiments

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.30769 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.30769v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30769 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words

Related coverage