aiqbench analysis
This study investigates how training trajectories influence the ability of small Transformers to retain learned retrieval circuits after removing attention biases. The research demonstrates that smooth annealing strategies preserve circuit functionality, whereas abrupt removal causes performance collapse, revealing critical dependencies on optimization paths rather than just final architecture. These findings offer actionable insights for designing robust mechanistic interpretability methods in discrete tasks without relying on persistent external priors.
Training Trajectories Determine Circuit Removability in Annealable Soft-Prior Transformers
arXiv:2609.10287v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Soft positional priors can help small Transformers learn retrieval circuits, but it is unclear whether the resulting circuits remain functional once the prior is removed. We test this with an annealable soft-prior Transformer whose attention biases can be learned, faded, or zeroed during training and evaluation. On associative recall, unforced models perform well with the prior active ($0.772 \pm 0.020$) but collapse at zero gate ($0.095 \pm 0.009$). Smooth fade-to-zero training preserves high zero-gate accuracy ($0.734 \pm 0.028$), whereas forced-zero training, hard switching, and post hoc continuation fail to recover the same effect. The pattern also appears on Markov induction. Linear regression ICL provides a boundary case because zero-gate training can learn that task directly. Mechanistic traces show that circuit consolidation occurs after the gate reaches zero, even though the responsible heads vary across seeds. These results suggest that circuit removability in small discrete retrieval tasks depends on the training trajectory, not just the final architecture.
Abstract:Soft positional priors can help small Transformers learn retrieval circuits, but it is unclear whether the resulting circuits remain functional once the prior is removed. We test this with an annealable soft-prior Transformer whose attention biases can be learned, faded, or zeroed during training and evaluation. On associative recall, unforced models perform well with the prior active ($0.772 \pm 0.020$) but collapse at zero gate ($0.095 \pm 0.009$). Smooth fade-to-zero training preserves high zero-gate accuracy ($0.734 \pm 0.028$), whereas forced-zero training, hard switching, and post hoc continuation fail to recover the same effect. The pattern also appears on Markov induction. Linear regression ICL provides a boundary case because zero-gate training can learn that task directly. Mechanistic traces show that circuit consolidation occurs after the gate reaches zero, even though the responsible heads vary across seeds. These results suggest that circuit removability in small discrete retrieval tasks depends on the training trajectory, not just the final architecture.
Accepted at PRICAI 2026. 15 pages
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
arXiv:2609.10287 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.10287v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10287 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026