aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a practical framework for integrating sustainability into e-commerce recommender systems by inferring missing carbon footprint data and applying post-hoc re-ranking to balance user engagement with environmental impact. The study demonstrates that significant carbon reductions are achievable across various product categories with minimal loss in user interaction, highlighting the viability of this trade-off strategy in real-world catalog settings. For practitioners, the key takeaway is the importance of selecting appropriate recommendation models and tuning the engagement-carbon parameter to maximize sustainability headroom within specific domains.
Trading Engagement for Sustainability: Carbon-Aware Re-ranking for E-commerce Recommendations
arXiv:2606.04550v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: E-commerce recommender systems strongly influence which products users consider and purchase, yet sustainability signals such as Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) are almost never available at catalog scale. We study carbon-aware product recommendation in the realistic setting where PCF labels are missing for most items and must be inferred. We first estimate product-level carbon footprints via a retrieval-augmented PCF estimation pipeline that transfers supervision from the Carbon Catalogue, a small set of life-cycle-assessed products, to a large unlabeled e-commerce catalog using semantic similarity search, few-shot LLM prompting, and a nearest-neighbour fallback. We then apply a carbon-aware post-hoc re-ranking strategy on top of relevance scores produced by three established recommendation models: BPR, NeuMF, and LightGCN. The method trades off predicted user-item engagement against estimated carbon footprint through a single tunable parameter, lambda. In this offline study, engagement is operationalized through Amazon review interactions, which serve as implicit feedback and as a proxy for user interest or purchase behavior. We evaluate the framework on the Amazon Reviews dataset across three product categories: Home and Kitchen, Sports and Outdoors, and Electronics. By sweeping lambda, we construct Pareto frontiers that characterize the achievable engagement and carbon trade-off for each model and category. Substantial carbon reductions are achievable at minimal engagement cost across all models and categories. However, the available carbon headroom varies by model and category, underscoring the importance of model choice and domain context.
Abstract:E-commerce recommender systems strongly influence which products users consider and purchase, yet sustainability signals such as Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) are almost never available at catalog scale. We study carbon-aware product recommendation in the realistic setting where PCF labels are missing for most items and must be inferred. We first estimate product-level carbon footprints via a retrieval-augmented PCF estimation pipeline that transfers supervision from the Carbon Catalogue, a small set of life-cycle-assessed products, to a large unlabeled e-commerce catalog using semantic similarity search, few-shot LLM prompting, and a nearest-neighbour fallback. We then apply a carbon-aware post-hoc re-ranking strategy on top of relevance scores produced by three established recommendation models: BPR, NeuMF, and LightGCN. The method trades off predicted user-item engagement against estimated carbon footprint through a single tunable parameter, lambda. In this offline study, engagement is operationalized through Amazon review interactions, which serve as implicit feedback and as a proxy for user interest or purchase behavior. We evaluate the framework on the Amazon Reviews dataset across three product categories: Home and Kitchen, Sports and Outdoors, and Electronics. By sweeping lambda, we construct Pareto frontiers that characterize the achievable engagement and carbon trade-off for each model and category. Substantial carbon reductions are achievable at minimal engagement cost across all models and categories. However, the available carbon headroom varies by model and category, underscoring the importance of model choice and domain context.
23 pages, 30 figures. Code available at this https URL
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
arXiv:2606.04550 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2606.04550v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04550 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · Aug 24, 2026