aiqbench analysis
This research advances interpretability in generative models by analyzing how training data clusters influence outputs within flow-matching architectures. The study demonstrates that attribution scores derived from trajectory dynamics offer a competitive alternative to semantic similarity baselines, reducing the need for computationally expensive counterfactual retraining. For practitioners in machine learning, this provides a more efficient method to trace specific data contributions without relying solely on gradient-based or leave-one-out approaches.
Tracing Generated Samples to Training-Data Clusters in Flow-Matching Models
arXiv:2608.30081v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding which training samples influence a generated image is an important problem in generative modeling. In flow matching, training samples influence the generated image through the velocity field along the generation trajectory. Removing samples to examine their counterfactual influence changes the velocity field, and the resulting effect on the final image depends on how the change propagates through the trajectory. Consequently, local changes in the velocity field do not necessarily predict the final counterfactual effect. This work investigates attribution in flow-matching models through a hybrid analytical--learned approach, and uses it to derive trajectory-based attribution scores at the cluster level. We evaluate these attribution scores using independently retrained leave-one-cluster-out (LOO) models, and compare with several attribution baselines using two different flow-matching latent spaces. Our experiments show that semantic similarity constitutes a strong baseline, while the closed-form trajectory-based attribution is competitive in some metrics without requiring counterfactual retraining or model gradients. Our results show that attribution in flow matching depends not only on semantic similarity to training samples, but also on the latent representation, trajectory dynamics, and how influence is propagated to the final output.
Abstract:Understanding which training samples influence a generated image is an important problem in generative modeling. In flow matching, training samples influence the generated image through the velocity field along the generation trajectory. Removing samples to examine their counterfactual influence changes the velocity field, and the resulting effect on the final image depends on how the change propagates through the trajectory. Consequently, local changes in the velocity field do not necessarily predict the final counterfactual effect. This work investigates attribution in flow-matching models through a hybrid analytical--learned approach, and uses it to derive trajectory-based attribution scores at the cluster level. We evaluate these attribution scores using independently retrained leave-one-cluster-out (LOO) models, and compare with several attribution baselines using two different flow-matching latent spaces. Our experiments show that semantic similarity constitutes a strong baseline, while the closed-form trajectory-based attribution is competitive in some metrics without requiring counterfactual retraining or model gradients. Our results show that attribution in flow matching depends not only on semantic similarity to training samples, but also on the latent representation, trajectory dynamics, and how influence is propagated to the final output.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2608.30081 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.30081v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30081 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026