aiqbench analysis
This research provides a mechanistic analysis of how Audio LLMs learn to rely on acoustic evidence rather than textual priors, revealing specific layer dynamics where training strengthens audio grounding. The findings clarify that while early layers shape answer representations through sound, the final prediction relies heavily on middle-to-late layer adjustments driven by non-inferable data. These insights are critical for understanding the internal architecture required to build robust multimodal systems that truly process audio inputs.
Tracing Audio Grounding and Answer Selection in Audio LLMs
arXiv:2609.04637v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) have advanced in audio understanding, yet they can still predict the answer by reasoning from textual cues or linguistic priors rather than the provided audio. A common remedy is to train models on data whose answers cannot be inferred from text alone. This approach can improve performance, but what changes within the model remains unclear. In this paper, we ask what must happen inside the model for the audio to actually determine the answer. Our findings are threefold. (1) Replacing the audio with silence or unrelated audio causes substantially larger performance degradation in the trained model than in the pretrained model. (2) Acoustic information most strongly shapes the model's representations of the answer choices in early-to-middle layers, while training mainly increases the influence of audio information on the final prediction in middle-to-late layers. (3) The weights learned during training have their largest impact in specific layer bands. Together, these results provide a mechanistic account of how training strengthens the use of acoustic evidence in Audio LLMs.
Abstract:Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) have advanced in audio understanding, yet they can still predict the answer by reasoning from textual cues or linguistic priors rather than the provided audio. A common remedy is to train models on data whose answers cannot be inferred from text alone. This approach can improve performance, but what changes within the model remains unclear. In this paper, we ask what must happen inside the model for the audio to actually determine the answer. Our findings are threefold. (1) Replacing the audio with silence or unrelated audio causes substantially larger performance degradation in the trained model than in the pretrained model. (2) Acoustic information most strongly shapes the model's representations of the answer choices in early-to-middle layers, while training mainly increases the influence of audio information on the final prediction in middle-to-late layers. (3) The weights learned during training have their largest impact in specific layer bands. Together, these results provide a mechanistic account of how training strengthens the use of acoustic evidence in Audio LLMs.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Sound (cs.SD)
arXiv:2609.04637 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.04637v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04637 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

Build enterprise search for agents with Amazon Bedrock Managed Knowledge Base
AWS · Jul 16, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

Presentation: Multi-Agent Patterns from Spotify’s AI Powered Advertising Platform
InfoQ · Oct 8, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026