aiqbench analysis
This research isolates a compact causal circuit within LLM-based text-to-speech models responsible for generating emotional prosody, demonstrating that specific attention heads and MLPs drive acoustic changes in pitch and energy. By quantifying these sparse components, the study reveals that internal activation shifts alone cannot fully explain decoded speech variations, highlighting the complex routing of emotion from input prefixes to output audio. These findings advance interpretability efforts by mapping precise neural pathways for affective generation without relying on black-box metrics.
Tracing a Sparse Emotion-Control Circuit in LLM-Based Text-to-Speech
arXiv:2610.05080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based text-to-speech (TTS) models can generate emotionally expressive speech, but how reference emotion is routed through the model and realized in decoded speech remains unclear. We introduce two emotion-sensitive metrics for matched neutral and emotional syntheses---a codec trajectory score and a late residual direction score---and use them to score activation-patching interventions. Under controlled matched-reference conditions, this analysis identifies a sparse source-to-readout component-level circuit: 23--27 attention heads and MLPs per emotion, roughly 5% of the components considered, recover or suppress 74--88% of the late emotion-readout shift on held-out cases. The circuit combines a shared component backbone with emotion-specific components; cross-emotion activation swaps reduce the target readout in 47 of 48 cases. In decoded speech, the same intervention produces consistent changes in pitch, energy, and spectral brightness over 24 matched pairs per emotion. A readout-matched residual-direction baseline produces only 17--27% of the intervention's pitch effect, showing that internal readout movement alone does not explain the decoded acoustic changes. These results trace a compact causal route from reference-derived prefix information to emotion-relevant properties of generated speech.
Abstract:LLM-based text-to-speech (TTS) models can generate emotionally expressive speech, but how reference emotion is routed through the model and realized in decoded speech remains unclear. We introduce two emotion-sensitive metrics for matched neutral and emotional syntheses---a codec trajectory score and a late residual direction score---and use them to score activation-patching interventions. Under controlled matched-reference conditions, this analysis identifies a sparse source-to-readout component-level circuit: 23--27 attention heads and MLPs per emotion, roughly 5% of the components considered, recover or suppress 74--88% of the late emotion-readout shift on held-out cases. The circuit combines a shared component backbone with emotion-specific components; cross-emotion activation swaps reduce the target readout in 47 of 48 cases. In decoded speech, the same intervention produces consistent changes in pitch, energy, and spectral brightness over 24 matched pairs per emotion. A readout-matched residual-direction baseline produces only 17--27% of the intervention's pitch effect, showing that internal readout movement alone does not explain the decoded acoustic changes. These results trace a compact causal route from reference-derived prefix information to emotion-relevant properties of generated speech.
Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). 15 pages, 4 figures
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.05080 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2610.05080v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05080 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Open Distillation of Hereditary Traits
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 14, 2026

2026.9: There's room on this bus
Home Assistant · Sep 2, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026