aiqbench analysis
TraceBench establishes a rigorous simulation framework for evaluating LLM agents in time-series root-cause analysis, revealing that performance heavily depends on domain context and numerical data exploration rather than visualizations. The study also highlights a significant drop in accuracy when agents are constrained to generate Python scripts for predictions compared to direct output submission. This benchmark provides essential insights into the limitations and operational modes of AI agents within complex dynamical systems.
TraceBench: Controlled Evaluation of LLM Agents for Time-Series Root-Cause Attribution
arXiv:2608.27182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly applied to anomaly detection and root-cause analysis in time-series observations collected from real-world systems; however, their performance on these tasks has not been systematically evaluated under controlled conditions. We introduce TraceBench, a simulation-based framework for generating controlled root-cause attribution tasks. In each generated task, an agent receives time-series observations produced by simulating a physical dynamical system and must determine whether a system parameter was altered during the simulation and, if so, which one. Using TraceBench, we generate tasks from three interpretable mechanical systems and systematically evaluate four LLM agents across controlled experimental conditions, yielding new insights into how these agents analyze time-series observations from dynamical systems. Our results show that agents benefit substantially from domain context and explore data primarily through numerical console output rather than visualizations. We also find that agents generally perform worse when required to produce a Python script that maps each time-series sample to a predicted root-cause label than when they submit predictions directly. We release our datasets, agent trajectories, experimental results, and a leaderboard on our website, tracebench.github.io.
Abstract:LLM agents are increasingly applied to anomaly detection and root-cause analysis in time-series observations collected from real-world systems; however, their performance on these tasks has not been systematically evaluated under controlled conditions. We introduce TraceBench, a simulation-based framework for generating controlled root-cause attribution tasks. In each generated task, an agent receives time-series observations produced by simulating a physical dynamical system and must determine whether a system parameter was altered during the simulation and, if so, which one. Using TraceBench, we generate tasks from three interpretable mechanical systems and systematically evaluate four LLM agents across controlled experimental conditions, yielding new insights into how these agents analyze time-series observations from dynamical systems. Our results show that agents benefit substantially from domain context and explore data primarily through numerical console output rather than visualizations. We also find that agents generally perform worse when required to produce a Python script that maps each time-series sample to a predicted root-cause label than when they submit predictions directly. We release our datasets, agent trajectories, experimental results, and a leaderboard on our website, this http URL.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.27182 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.27182v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27182 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
tracebench_representative_agent_trajectory.pdf
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · Oct 8, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026