Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a standardized virtual sea trial framework within the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator to automate Turning Circle and Zig-Zag maneuvers for unmanned surface vehicles. By ensuring traceable logging and strict adherence to IMO/ITTC metrics, the study enhances the repeatability of system identification processes without relying on costly physical trials. The work effectively bridges simulation fidelity with regulatory compliance standards essential for autonomous marine navigation development.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Traceable Virtual Sea Trials in the Marine Robotics Unity Simulator for Manoeuvring Assessment of Unmanned Surface Vehicles

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.12349v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurate identification of hydrodynamic derivatives is essential for precise control and autonomous navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs). However, acquiring high-fidelity manoeuvring data from physical sea trials is often constrained by cost, safety, and environmental disturbances. Standard manoeuvring trials, particularly Turning Circle (TC) and Zig-Zag (ZZ), remain fundamental to IMO and ITTC assessment procedures because they provide comparable performance metrics reflective of underlying hydrodynamic behaviour. This paper extends the open-source Marine Robotics Unity Simulator (MARUS) by introducing a standardised Virtual Sea Trial framework for automated execution and data generation of TC/ZZ manoeuvres. The framework provides traceable command-actuation logging, system-identification (SI)-focused data conditioning, and automated extraction of IMO/ITTC-aligned manoeuvring metrics. A key contribution is a dedicated TC/ZZ data acquisition and post-processing pipeline, improving the repeatability and auditability of simulator-based manoeuvres while producing SI-ready datasets for hydrodynamic-derivative identification and digital-twin workflows. The framework also provides explicit command-execution separation for differential-thrust steering, where manoeuvre inputs are recorded as ordered rudder-equivalent commands and realised actuation is logged as an execution-level proxy derived from applied thrust. Case study results demonstrate repeatable and IMO-compliant manoeuvre behaviour. For TC tests, the normalised advance differs by approximately 3.9% between port and starboard turns, while the tactical diameter differs by 4.6-4.7%. For ZZ tests, first and second overshoot excesses remain below 1 degree for both +/-10-degree and +/-20-degree manoeuvres, satisfying IMO criteria, while peak yaw rates range from approximately 4.1 to 5.8 degrees/second.

Abstract:Accurate identification of hydrodynamic derivatives is essential for precise control and autonomous navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs). However, acquiring high-fidelity manoeuvring data from physical sea trials is often constrained by cost, safety, and environmental disturbances. Standard manoeuvring trials, particularly Turning Circle (TC) and Zig-Zag (ZZ), remain fundamental to IMO and ITTC assessment procedures because they provide comparable performance metrics reflective of underlying hydrodynamic behaviour. This paper extends the open-source Marine Robotics Unity Simulator (MARUS) by introducing a standardised Virtual Sea Trial framework for automated execution and data generation of TC/ZZ manoeuvres. The framework provides traceable command-actuation logging, system-identification (SI)-focused data conditioning, and automated extraction of IMO/ITTC-aligned manoeuvring metrics. A key contribution is a dedicated TC/ZZ data acquisition and post-processing pipeline, improving the repeatability and auditability of simulator-based manoeuvres while producing SI-ready datasets for hydrodynamic-derivative identification and digital-twin workflows. The framework also provides explicit command-execution separation for differential-thrust steering, where manoeuvre inputs are recorded as ordered rudder-equivalent commands and realised actuation is logged as an execution-level proxy derived from applied thrust. Case study results demonstrate repeatable and IMO-compliant manoeuvre behaviour. For TC tests, the normalised advance differs by approximately 3.9% between port and starboard turns, while the tactical diameter differs by 4.6-4.7%. For ZZ tests, first and second overshoot excesses remain below 1 degree for both +/-10-degree and +/-20-degree manoeuvres, satisfying IMO criteria, while peak yaw rates range from approximately 4.1 to 5.8 degrees/second.

Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

arXiv:2606.12349 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2606.12349v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12349 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 329 words

Related coverage