aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces TRACE, a model-agnostic framework that enforces auditability for deep learning-driven robots by structuring decisions into four traceable layers linking sensor data to actions. By achieving near-perfect evidence traceability in simulated warehouse scenarios, it directly addresses the critical safety and regulatory gaps highlighted by frameworks like the EU AI Act. The work shifts the focus from opaque feature attributions to complete causal reconstruction, setting a new standard for safety-critical autonomous systems.
Towards Trustworthy Autonomous Robots: An Explainable AI-Based Decision Framework
arXiv:2609.02861v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous robots powered by deep learning face a fundamental auditability challenge: when incidents occur, investigators cannot reconstruct why the system made specific decisions. This paper presents TRACE (Transparent Reasoning Architecture for Credible Execution), a decision framework that ensures every autonomous action can be traced back to sensor evidence through documented causal chains. The framework organizes decision-making into four auditable layers: Semantic Perception for evidence-grounded entity recognition, Belief Reasoning for probabilistic state estimation with causal graphs, Action Synthesis for constraint-aware planning with counterfactual documentation, and Execution Verification for compliance monitoring. TRACE is model-agnostic yet designed to integrate learning-based perception modules (CNNs, transformers) while preserving decision-level auditability. We evaluate the framework using three objective metrics: Evidence Traceability (sensor-to-decision linkage), Decision Reconstructability (post-hoc analysis capability), and Temporal Continuity (audit trail completeness). Experimental evaluation on warehouse robot navigation demonstrates that TRACE achieves 98.6% evidence traceability, 99.0% temporal continuity, and 98.1% decision reconstructability across 500 simulated decision cycles. Post-hoc methods like LIME provide feature attributions but lack the artifact structure needed for decision-level reconstruction. The framework addresses EU AI Act requirements for high-risk system transparency and contributes to Explainable AI for safety-critical autonomous systems.
Abstract:Autonomous robots powered by deep learning face a fundamental auditability challenge: when incidents occur, investigators cannot reconstruct why the system made specific decisions. This paper presents TRACE (Transparent Reasoning Architecture for Credible Execution), a decision framework that ensures every autonomous action can be traced back to sensor evidence through documented causal chains. The framework organizes decision-making into four auditable layers: Semantic Perception for evidence-grounded entity recognition, Belief Reasoning for probabilistic state estimation with causal graphs, Action Synthesis for constraint-aware planning with counterfactual documentation, and Execution Verification for compliance monitoring. TRACE is model-agnostic yet designed to integrate learning-based perception modules (CNNs, transformers) while preserving decision-level auditability. We evaluate the framework using three objective metrics: Evidence Traceability (sensor-to-decision linkage), Decision Reconstructability (post-hoc analysis capability), and Temporal Continuity (audit trail completeness). Experimental evaluation on warehouse robot navigation demonstrates that TRACE achieves 98.6% evidence traceability, 99.0% temporal continuity, and 98.1% decision reconstructability across 500 simulated decision cycles. Post-hoc methods like LIME provide feature attributions but lack the artifact structure needed for decision-level reconstruction. The framework addresses EU AI Act requirements for high-risk system transparency and contributes to Explainable AI for safety-critical autonomous systems.
7 pages. Accepted version. Published in SoutheastCon 2026, IEEE, pp. 1-6
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.02861 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.02861v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02861 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
SoutheastCon 2026, IEEE, pp. 1-6, February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1109/SoutheastCon63549.2026.11476455 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · Sep 16, 2026

Podcast: Securing AI Agents: Identity, Authorization, and the DPACT Framework
InfoQ · Sep 21, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026