aiqbench analysis
This research advances structural health monitoring for wind turbines by integrating explainable machine learning with physics-based insights to interpret aerodynamic pressure data. The study moves beyond black-box classification to ensure physical consistency in detecting damage on flexible turbine blades under varying operational conditions. By enhancing transparency and robustness, this approach addresses critical limitations in purely data-driven models for real-time structural monitoring.
Towards Interpretable Damage Detection based on Aerodynamic Pressure Measurements
arXiv:2605.08187v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The increasing flexibility of modern large wind turbine blades necessitates cost-efficient and reliable structural monitoring solutions. For this purpose, we propose to use aerodynamic pressure measurements obtained via Aerosense, a novel, non-intrusive and economical sensing system. In former work [Franz et al., 2025], we investigated the potential of aerodynamic pressure measurements for structural damage detection on elastic and aerodynamically loaded structures. An experimental campaign was conducted on a NACA 633418 airfoil mounted on a vertically vibrating cantilever beam within an open wind tunnel. Structural damage was introduced progressively through controlled saw cuts near the beam support. Aerodynamic pressure distributions were recorded under varying inflow conditions and structural states. Based on this data set, we developed a convolutional neural network to detect structural damage and classify its severity using only aerodynamic pressure signals. The results demonstrate that pressure measurements can effectively enable real-time detection and quantification of damage in elastic, beam-like structures subjected to mildly turbulent flow and varying operational conditions. Recognizing the limitations of pure black-box classification, in this study, we further incorporate physics-based insights and explainable machine learning methods to interpret how structural damage influences both the dynamic response and the aerodynamic pressure field. This leads to an enhanced damage detection pipeline, aiming to improve transparency, robustness, and physical consistency in data-driven monitoring of elastic, aerodynamically loaded structures.
Abstract:The increasing flexibility of modern large wind turbine blades necessitates cost-efficient and reliable structural monitoring solutions. For this purpose, we propose to use aerodynamic pressure measurements obtained via Aerosense, a novel, non-intrusive and economical sensing system. In former work [Franz et al., 2025], we investigated the potential of aerodynamic pressure measurements for structural damage detection on elastic and aerodynamically loaded structures. An experimental campaign was conducted on a NACA 633418 airfoil mounted on a vertically vibrating cantilever beam within an open wind tunnel. Structural damage was introduced progressively through controlled saw cuts near the beam support. Aerodynamic pressure distributions were recorded under varying inflow conditions and structural states. Based on this data set, we developed a convolutional neural network to detect structural damage and classify its severity using only aerodynamic pressure signals. The results demonstrate that pressure measurements can effectively enable real-time detection and quantification of damage in elastic, beam-like structures subjected to mildly turbulent flow and varying operational conditions. Recognizing the limitations of pure black-box classification, in this study, we further incorporate physics-based insights and explainable machine learning methods to interpret how structural damage influences both the dynamic response and the aerodynamic pressure field. This leads to an enhanced damage detection pipeline, aiming to improve transparency, robustness, and physical consistency in data-driven monitoring of elastic, aerodynamically loaded structures.
Signal Processing (eess.SP); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.08187 [eess.SP]
(or arXiv:2605.08187v2 [eess.SP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08187 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026