aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the "reality gap" in Cyber-Physical Systems by proposing a framework to identify and leverage invalidated design assumptions, termed "design illusions," as reusable knowledge rather than merely correcting simulations. By structuring these discrepancies into an actionable pipeline, the research aims to improve the robustness of autonomous systems operating in open environments where perfect prediction is impossible.
Towards Illusions Awareness in Cyber-Physical System's Design
arXiv:2609.17260v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) operate through a continuous sense-compute-act loop within an open context environment, making it impossible to anticipate all the situations the system will face. To cope with this openness, stakeholders rely on assumptions, formalized into design models. However, these assumptions may no longer hold once the system is confronted with runtime reality, resulting in a discrepancy between expected and observed behaviour known in literature as the reality gap. Existing approaches mainly focus on reducing or overcoming it by making simulations more faithful to reality, with no unified methodology to structure and exploit invalidated assumptions that give rise to this gap as reusable design knowledge. We refer to the persistent reliance on invalidated assumptions -and the resulting false confidence in the design model's operational validity -as design illusions, and argue that they need to be made explicit, structured, and exploited as knowledge to support better design decisions. We propose a conceptual pipeline for illusions-awareness that identifies, classifies, characterizes, and leverages illusions to transform them into actionable design knowledge.
Abstract:Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) operate through a continuous sense-compute-act loop within an open context environment, making it impossible to anticipate all the situations the system will face. To cope with this openness, stakeholders rely on assumptions, formalized into design models. However, these assumptions may no longer hold once the system is confronted with runtime reality, resulting in a discrepancy between expected and observed behaviour known in literature as the reality gap. Existing approaches mainly focus on reducing or overcoming it by making simulations more faithful to reality, with no unified methodology to structure and exploit invalidated assumptions that give rise to this gap as reusable design knowledge. We refer to the persistent reliance on invalidated assumptions -and the resulting false confidence in the design model's operational validity -as design illusions, and argue that they need to be made explicit, structured, and exploited as knowledge to support better design decisions. We propose a conceptual pipeline for illusions-awareness that identifies, classifies, characterizes, and leverages illusions to transform them into actionable design knowledge.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.17260 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.17260v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17260 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026