aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical instability in full-pipeline FP8 reinforcement learning for LLMs, where quantization noise distorts importance ratios and causes pathological outputs to accumulate. The authors introduce "Calibrated Clipping," a dynamic method that aligns low-precision clipping bounds with high-precision distributions to restore training stability and match BF16 performance. This work is essential for practitioners seeking to deploy efficient RL fine-tuning without sacrificing model reliability or reasoning capabilities.
Towards Full Pipeline FP8 Reinforcement Learning for LLMs
arXiv:2609.22870v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key technique for improving the reasoning and agentic abilities of large language models (LLMs). Although FP8 quantization can accelerate RL training, maintaining stability throughout an FP8 RL pipeline remains challenging. While previous works have focused on resolving train-inference mismatches using correction techniques like TIS, we reveal that full-pipeline FP8 RL still suffers from severe training instability, manifesting as anomalous mid-training entropy surges and garbled outputs. We trace this instability to a previously overlooked cause: compounded FP8 quantization noise distorts the importance ratio, disproportionately pushing negative-advantage tokens outside the trust region and erroneously zeroing out their gradients. As a result, pathological outputs are not properly penalized and accumulate over the course of training. To address this, we propose Calibrated Clipping, a dynamic method that aligns the FP8 clipping bounds with high-precision BF16 distributions by matching the lower-bound clipping quantile and rebalancing the upper bound accordingly. Extensive experiments across GRPO and DAPO algorithms, model scales from 8B to 32B, and multiple FP8 scaling granularities demonstrate that our approach successfully eliminates entropy surges and restores performance comparable to the BF16 baseline.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a key technique for improving the reasoning and agentic abilities of large language models (LLMs). Although FP8 quantization can accelerate RL training, maintaining stability throughout an FP8 RL pipeline remains challenging. While previous works have focused on resolving train-inference mismatches using correction techniques like TIS, we reveal that full-pipeline FP8 RL still suffers from severe training instability, manifesting as anomalous mid-training entropy surges and garbled outputs. We trace this instability to a previously overlooked cause: compounded FP8 quantization noise distorts the importance ratio, disproportionately pushing negative-advantage tokens outside the trust region and erroneously zeroing out their gradients. As a result, pathological outputs are not properly penalized and accumulate over the course of training. To address this, we propose Calibrated Clipping, a dynamic method that aligns the FP8 clipping bounds with high-precision BF16 distributions by matching the lower-bound clipping quantile and rebalancing the upper bound accordingly. Extensive experiments across GRPO and DAPO algorithms, model scales from 8B to 32B, and multiple FP8 scaling granularities demonstrate that our approach successfully eliminates entropy surges and restores performance comparable to the BF16 baseline.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.22870 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22870v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22870 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026

Granite 4.2 LLMs: How They're Built
Hugging Face · Aug 25, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026

The art and science of hyperparameter optimization on Amazon Nova Forge
AWS · Jun 2, 2026