Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This framework addresses critical gaps in financial AI by introducing a self-correcting agent architecture that combines retrieval, reasoning, and judicial evaluation to mitigate numeric hallucinations. By logging every decision with confidence scores, the system provides the necessary audit trails for regulated environments while recovering nearly 40% of initially incorrect answers through targeted retries.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Towards Expert Financial QA via Self-Improving RAG

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26706v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Expert-level financial question answering requires both grounded verification to catch numeric hallucinations and audit trails for regulatory compliance, attributes that standard single-pass RAG systems lack. We take a step toward this goal with Self-Improving RAG, a framework that decomposes document QA into three specialized agents (Retrieval, Reasoning, and Judge) coordinated by an orchestrator with feedback-driven self-correction. When the Judge Agent scores an answer below a dynamic threshold, the system triggers retry with escalated strategies: broader retrieval, more careful prompting, and relaxed acceptance criteria. We evaluate on FinanceBench (SEC filing QA), where Self-Improving RAG achieves 86% oracle-guided accuracy (measuring agreement with gold answers) with a 36.4% Lazarus Rate, recovering nearly 4 in 10 initially incorrect answers through targeted retry. A key finding is that a fixed retrieval pipeline with judge-driven retry achieves strong results without dynamic routing, providing full interpretability. Every decision is logged with confidence scores, enabling the audit trails required for regulated financial applications.

Abstract:Expert-level financial question answering requires both grounded verification to catch numeric hallucinations and audit trails for regulatory compliance, attributes that standard single-pass RAG systems lack. We take a step toward this goal with Self-Improving RAG, a framework that decomposes document QA into three specialized agents (Retrieval, Reasoning, and Judge) coordinated by an orchestrator with feedback-driven self-correction. When the Judge Agent scores an answer below a dynamic threshold, the system triggers retry with escalated strategies: broader retrieval, more careful prompting, and relaxed acceptance criteria. We evaluate on FinanceBench (SEC filing QA), where Self-Improving RAG achieves 86% oracle-guided accuracy (measuring agreement with gold answers) with a 36.4% Lazarus Rate, recovering nearly 4 in 10 initially incorrect answers through targeted retry. A key finding is that a fixed retrieval pipeline with judge-driven retry achieves strong results without dynamic routing, providing full interpretability. Every decision is logged with confidence scores, enabling the audit trails required for regulated financial applications.

17 pages, 2 figures. Accepted at the ICLR 2026 Workshop on Advances in Financial AI

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.26706 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.26706v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26706 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words

Related coverage