Towards a theory of morphology-driven marking in the lexicon: The case of the state

Abstract:All languages have a noun category, but its realisation varies considerably. Depending on the language, semantic and/or morphosyntactic differences may be more or less pronounced. This paper explores these variations, using Riffian as a reference point before extending the analysis to other languages. We propose a formal model termed morphology-driven marking. Nouns are organised into modular cognitive sets, each with its own morphological template and unmarked form. This approach helps explain differences in marking among noun types within and across languages. By situating these patterns within syntactic functions, we also reassess the notions of markedness and state. It is proposed that the concept of state be extended to all synthetic languages and analysed a novel subcategory of syntax-based inflection like agreement and grammatical case.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2604.03422 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2604.03422v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03422 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.