Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This paper synthesizes existing systems research to propose a Sustainable Inference Control Plane for distributed LLM serving, arguing that sustainability is a complex control problem rather than a result of single hardware or model choices. It outlines a framework for routing and scaling decisions that jointly optimize latency, energy, carbon intensity, and cache reuse while strictly adhering to service-level objectives. The work provides a practical research agenda for integrating environmental constraints directly into the operational logic of large-scale inference systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Toward Sustainable Distributed LLM Inference: A Systems Synthesis and Research Agenda for an Energy-, Carbon-, and Cache-Aware llm-d Control Plane

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.05565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) sustainability is increasingly a serving-systems problem, not only a training problem. In production, energy and carbon impact depend on more than model size: workload shape, batching, key-value (KV) cache reuse, prefill/decode placement, model and accelerator choice, power state, geographic carbon intensity, and service-level objectives (SLOs) all matter. Recent systems papers study many of these factors separately. This paper connects those results and asks a practical engineering question: what do they imply when the decision point is a distributed inference control plane such as llm-d? The contribution here is synthesis, not a new set of benchmark results. Reported performance, energy, carbon, and cost improvements remain the results of the cited papers and systems. I group the literature into recurring design patterns and use those patterns to sketch a Sustainable Inference Control Plane (SICP) for llm-d. The proposed control plane would consider latency, energy, carbon, cache reuse, serving cost, and quality when routing and scaling, while keeping TTFT/TPOT SLOs as hard constraints. I also outline an evaluation framework based on SLO-satisfied goodput per joule and per gram CO2e, together with a reproducible experimental plan. The main observation from connecting the literature is that sustainable LLM inference is unlikely to come from one "green" model or one accelerator; it is more naturally treated as a control problem across model, phase, cache, hardware, replica, region, and time.

Abstract:Large language model (LLM) sustainability is increasingly a serving-systems problem, not only a training problem. In production, energy and carbon impact depend on more than model size: workload shape, batching, key-value (KV) cache reuse, prefill/decode placement, model and accelerator choice, power state, geographic carbon intensity, and service-level objectives (SLOs) all matter. Recent systems papers study many of these factors separately. This paper connects those results and asks a practical engineering question: what do they imply when the decision point is a distributed inference control plane such as llm-d? The contribution here is synthesis, not a new set of benchmark results. Reported performance, energy, carbon, and cost improvements remain the results of the cited papers and systems. I group the literature into recurring design patterns and use those patterns to sketch a Sustainable Inference Control Plane (SICP) for llm-d. The proposed control plane would consider latency, energy, carbon, cache reuse, serving cost, and quality when routing and scaling, while keeping TTFT/TPOT SLOs as hard constraints. I also outline an evaluation framework based on SLO-satisfied goodput per joule and per gram CO2e, together with a reproducible experimental plan. The main observation from connecting the literature is that sustainable LLM inference is unlikely to come from one "green" model or one accelerator; it is more naturally treated as a control problem across model, phase, cache, hardware, replica, region, and time.

13 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. Systems synthesis and research agenda for sustainability-aware distributed LLM inference. No new experimental measurements are claimed; reported results are attributed to the cited work

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.05565 [cs.DC]

(or arXiv:2609.05565v1 [cs.DC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05565 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words

Related coverage