aiqbench analysis
This paper resolves a longstanding open problem in online learning by presenting a unified algorithm that achieves optimal switching regret against oblivious adversaries, even when the number of environment changes is unknown. The approach leverages fixed-share learners combined with dyadic-interval subroutines and randomized exploration to adapt dynamically without requiring prior knowledge of change frequency. This advancement strengthens theoretical foundations for robust decision-making in non-stationary environments, a critical consideration for deploying AI agents in real-world dynamic systems.
Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversary
arXiv:2609.13547v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study switching regret in adversarial multi-armed bandits, where the learner competes with an arm sequence that changes at most $S$ times. When $S$ is known, an optimal expected regret of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT})$ is obtainable [Auer et al., 2002]. However, when $S$ is unknown, Marinov and Zimmert [2021] show that this guarantee is impossible under an adaptive adversary. In this paper, we show that a single algorithm achieves $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT})$ expected regret for every $S$ against an oblivious adversary, resolving an open problem of Auer et al. [2019b]. Our algorithm combines a fixed-share learner initialized with a small learning rate and dyadic-interval subroutines that search for local improvements using randomized learning rates and implicit exploration. Importantly, a non-uniform prior favors following the main learner, keeping the cost of maintaining many subroutines small. When the subroutines accumulate sufficient improvement over the main learner, its learning rate doubles, allowing adaptation to the unknown number of comparator switches $S$.
Abstract:We study switching regret in adversarial multi-armed bandits, where the learner competes with an arm sequence that changes at most $S$ times. When $S$ is known, an optimal expected regret of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT})$ is obtainable [Auer et al., 2002]. However, when $S$ is unknown, Marinov and Zimmert [2021] show that this guarantee is impossible under an adaptive adversary. In this paper, we show that a single algorithm achieves $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT})$ expected regret for every $S$ against an oblivious adversary, resolving an open problem of Auer et al. [2019b]. Our algorithm combines a fixed-share learner initialized with a small learning rate and dyadic-interval subroutines that search for local improvements using randomized learning rates and implicit exploration. Importantly, a non-uniform prior favors following the main learner, keeping the cost of maintaining many subroutines small. When the subroutines accumulate sufficient improvement over the main learner, its learning rate doubles, allowing adaptation to the unknown number of comparator switches $S$.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.13547 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.13547v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13547 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words
Related coverage

Grantmakers aren’t afraid to die
LessWrong · Sep 17, 2026
Toward the Optimal Regret-Instability Trade-off in Multi-Armed Bandits
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026
Bandits with Multiple Optimal Arms: Minimax Regret and Non-Adaptivit
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
Does 1/2-Tsallis-INF Also Work Well for Best-Arm Identification?
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026