Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances the theoretical understanding of adversarial Markov decision processes by introducing MA-OPS, an algorithm that achieves optimal regret bounds dependent on feasibility margins. By combining optimistic margin search with pessimistic policy evaluation, it resolves a gap between previous upper and lower bounds in constrained stochastic settings. The work represents a significant contribution to reinforcement learning theory, specifically addressing safety constraints under adversarial loss conditions.
Sources coveringarXiv, InfoQ, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Toward Optimal Regret in Adversarial MDPs with Stochastic Hard Constraints

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.12153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study episodic constrained Markov decision processes with adversarial losses under stochastic hard constraints. Specifically, starting from a known strictly feasible policy with margin $d$, we seek to obtain optimal regret while satisfying the expected cost constraints in every episode. In this setting, Stradi et al. (2025) show that a carefully designed mixing rule attains regret of order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T}/\min\{d,d^2\})$. Interestingly, they also provide a lower bound of order $\Omega(\sqrt{T}/\rho)$ for the same setting, where $\rho$ is the Slater margin of the offline problem and can be much larger than $d$. In this work, we build on their approach to obtain optimal regret dependence on these margins. Specifically, we propose MA-OPS, an algorithm that combines an optimistic search for the Slater margin with a pessimistic evaluation of the selected policies to safely learn a policy with a large feasibility margin. This policy is then used to minimize regret while satisfying the constraints at every episode. In particular, we show that MA-OPS attains regret $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T}/\rho + 1/(d\rho))$. Finally, we provide a matching lower bound, showing that the dependence on $T$, $d$, $\rho$ in the regret bound is optimal up to logarithmic factors.

Abstract:We study episodic constrained Markov decision processes with adversarial losses under stochastic hard constraints. Specifically, starting from a known strictly feasible policy with margin $d$, we seek to obtain optimal regret while satisfying the expected cost constraints in every episode. In this setting, Stradi et al. (2025) show that a carefully designed mixing rule attains regret of order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T}/\min\{d,d^2\})$. Interestingly, they also provide a lower bound of order $\Omega(\sqrt{T}/\rho)$ for the same setting, where $\rho$ is the Slater margin of the offline problem and can be much larger than $d$. In this work, we build on their approach to obtain optimal regret dependence on these margins. Specifically, we propose MA-OPS, an algorithm that combines an optimistic search for the Slater margin with a pessimistic evaluation of the selected policies to safely learn a policy with a large feasibility margin. This policy is then used to minimize regret while satisfying the constraints at every episode. In particular, we show that MA-OPS attains regret $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T}/\rho + 1/(d\rho))$. Finally, we provide a matching lower bound, showing that the dependence on $T$, $d$, $\rho$ in the regret bound is optimal up to logarithmic factors.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.12153 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.12153v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12153 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 284 words

Related coverage