aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the critical safety challenges of deploying generative AI in high-stakes Air Traffic Management by introducing a model-agnostic decision assurance layer. The proposed architecture evaluates semantic stability and operational consistency to assign a Decision Readiness Level, ensuring human operators can trust AI-generated flight plans before execution. While demonstrated in aviation, this framework offers a transferable blueprint for regulating non-deterministic AI systems in other safety-critical domains with strict regulatory requirements.
Toward a Decision-Assurance Layer for AI-Assisted Flight Planning in Air Traffic Management
arXiv:2609.13552v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI is increasingly being used informally in Air Traffic Management (ATM) for tasks such as flight plan generation, trajectory interpretation, and constraint checking. Although these tools can reduce workload and accelerate planning, their non-deterministic outputs create safety and operational risks in human-in-the-loop settings. This paper proposes the AI Trust and Assurance Layer (ATAL), a model-agnostic decision assurance architecture that evaluates whether AI-generated flight-planning outputs are sufficiently reliable for operational use. ATAL combines semantic stability under prompt variation, operational consistency of structured outputs, and normative constraint validation against domain rules, and maps these signals to a Decision Readiness Level (DRL) for human operators. An ATM-inspired experimental study shows how unsafe, inconsistent, or misleading outputs can be identified before influencing flight-plan validation or execution. Although demonstrated in aviation, the framework is also transferable to other safety-critical decision-support domains that require human oversight under regulatory constraints.
Abstract:Generative AI is increasingly being used informally in Air Traffic Management (ATM) for tasks such as flight plan generation, trajectory interpretation, and constraint checking. Although these tools can reduce workload and accelerate planning, their non-deterministic outputs create safety and operational risks in human-in-the-loop settings. This paper proposes the AI Trust and Assurance Layer (ATAL), a model-agnostic decision assurance architecture that evaluates whether AI-generated flight-planning outputs are sufficiently reliable for operational use. ATAL combines semantic stability under prompt variation, operational consistency of structured outputs, and normative constraint validation against domain rules, and maps these signals to a Decision Readiness Level (DRL) for human operators. An ATM-inspired experimental study shows how unsafe, inconsistent, or misleading outputs can be identified before influencing flight-plan validation or execution. Although demonstrated in aviation, the framework is also transferable to other safety-critical decision-support domains that require human oversight under regulatory constraints.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.13552 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.13552v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13552 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words
Related coverage
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026