aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical misalignment where LLMs over-prioritize explicit logical structure ("logic overbinding") compared to real user engagement, which favors affective and expressive salience. The authors propose OMRA, a technique that reconstructs content to better match human preferences, successfully narrowing this gap by over 50% across multiple model families. This work is essential for aligning generative AI outputs with authentic community interaction patterns rather than synthetic optimization metrics.
Too Good to Be Real? Diagnosing and Reducing the Gap Between AI Preference and Real User Engagement
arXiv:2609.18282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to generate and evaluate online content, yet it remains unclear whether the qualities they associate with higher engagement match what real users respond to. We study this question using 1.17 million answers to 25,978 questions from Zhihu, Quora, and Reddit, comparing real platform answers and AI-generated answers across four within-question engagement levels. We introduce Ontological Preference Measurement, which represents answers along three dimensions: logic, affect, and expression. We find a systematic gap between AI preference and real user engagement: as target engagement increases, LLMs add more explicit logical structure, while real user engagement is more strongly associated with affective and expressive salience. We call this tendency logic overbinding. Based on this diagnosis, we propose Ontology-Masked Reasoning Autoencoding (OMRA), a controlled intervention that masks and reconstructs over-explained spans while preserving stance, factual content, and coherence. Across four LLM families, OMRA reduces the measured gap by an average of 54.4%. In human evaluation, OMRA wins 62.4% of pairwise preference judgments against matched real platform answers, even though the real answers are more often judged to be human-written.
Title:Too Good to Be Real? Diagnosing and Reducing the Gap Between AI Preference and Real User Engagement
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used to generate and evaluate online content, yet it remains unclear whether the qualities they associate with higher engagement match what real users respond to. We study this question using 1.17 million answers to 25,978 questions from Zhihu, Quora, and Reddit, comparing real platform answers and AI-generated answers across four within-question engagement levels. We introduce Ontological Preference Measurement, which represents answers along three dimensions: logic, affect, and expression. We find a systematic gap between AI preference and real user engagement: as target engagement increases, LLMs add more explicit logical structure, while real user engagement is more strongly associated with affective and expressive salience. We call this tendency logic overbinding. Based on this diagnosis, we propose Ontology-Masked Reasoning Autoencoding (OMRA), a controlled intervention that masks and reconstructs over-explained spans while preserving stance, factual content, and coherence. Across four LLM families, OMRA reduces the measured gap by an average of 54.4%. In human evaluation, OMRA wins 62.4% of pairwise preference judgments against matched real platform answers, even though the real answers are more often judged to be human-written.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.18282 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.18282v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18282 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 2, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
DI Series: Serving Kimi-K3 MXFP4 Wide-EP Disaggregated on AMD Instinct MI300X and MI325X
AMD · Oct 8, 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · Sep 27, 2026