aiqbench analysis
This theoretical study refines convergence bounds for logistic regression in two-dimensional settings, demonstrating how large stepsizes can accelerate training despite initial loss non-monotonicity. By establishing tight upper and lower limits on the transition from unstable to stable dynamics, the work provides rigorous mathematical guarantees essential for understanding optimization landscapes in low dimensions.
Tight Bounds for Logistic Regression with Large Stepsize Gradient Descent in Low Dimension
arXiv:2602.12471v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We consider the optimization problem of minimizing the logistic loss with gradient descent to train a linear model for binary classification with separable data. With a budget of $T$ iterations, it was recently shown that an accelerated $1/T^2$ rate is possible by choosing a large stepsize $\eta = \Theta(\gamma^2 T)$ (where $\gamma$ is the dataset's margin) despite the resulting non-monotonicity of the loss. In this paper, we provide a tighter analysis of gradient descent for this problem when the data is two-dimensional: we show that GD with a sufficiently large learning rate $\eta$ finds a point with loss smaller than $\mathcal{O}(1/(\eta \gamma^2 T))$, as long as $T \geq \Omega(n/\gamma + 1/\gamma^2)$, where $n$ is the dataset size. Our improved rate comes from a tighter bound on the time $\tau$ that it takes for GD to transition from unstable (non-monotonic loss) to stable (monotonic loss), via a fine-grained analysis of the oscillatory dynamics of GD in the subspace orthogonal to the max-margin classifier. We also provide a lower bound of $\tau$ matching our upper bound up to logarithmic factors, showing that our analysis is tight.
Abstract:We consider the optimization problem of minimizing the logistic loss with gradient descent to train a linear model for binary classification with separable data. With a budget of $T$ iterations, it was recently shown that an accelerated $1/T^2$ rate is possible by choosing a large stepsize $\eta = \Theta(\gamma^2 T)$ (where $\gamma$ is the dataset's margin) despite the resulting non-monotonicity of the loss. In this paper, we provide a tighter analysis of gradient descent for this problem when the data is two-dimensional: we show that GD with a sufficiently large learning rate $\eta$ finds a point with loss smaller than $\mathcal{O}(1/(\eta \gamma^2 T))$, as long as $T \geq \Omega(n/\gamma + 1/\gamma^2)$, where $n$ is the dataset size. Our improved rate comes from a tighter bound on the time $\tau$ that it takes for GD to transition from unstable (non-monotonic loss) to stable (monotonic loss), via a fine-grained analysis of the oscillatory dynamics of GD in the subspace orthogonal to the max-margin classifier. We also provide a lower bound of $\tau$ matching our upper bound up to logarithmic factors, showing that our analysis is tight.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.12471 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.12471v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.12471 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 276 words
Related coverage
Tight Transition Time Bounds for Separable Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stability
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Improved Convergence of Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
Finite-Sample Performance of Gradient Descent in Logistic Regression with Gaussian Design
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026