aiqbench analysis
tidyHEBO introduces a robust, BoTorch-native optimizer that integrates output warping and Pareto search to consistently outperform existing methods on black-box optimization benchmarks without requiring specific hyperparameter tuning. By addressing implementation details often overlooked in standard Bayesian optimization workflows, this tool offers practitioners a reliable solution for expensive function optimization tasks ranging from scientific applications to hyperparameter tuning.
tidyHEBO: Robust General-Purpose Bayesian Optimization with Model-Consistent Warping and Pareto Search
arXiv:2607.10669v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is widely used for expensive black-box problems, yet practical performance depends not only on high-level algorithmic choices but also on how surrogate model training, input and output warping transformations, acquisition functions, and candidate search are implemented. We present tidyHEBO, a BoTorch-native single-objective optimizer designed for robust general-purpose optimization. tidyHEBO jointly fits Yeo-Johnson output warping with the Gaussian-process surrogate, evaluates acquisition functions on the original objective scale using deterministic quadrature or MC-samples, and performs constrained cumulative Pareto search over multiple acquisition criteria. Without any Olympus-specific hyperparameter tuning - using only default optimizer configurations - tidyHEBO ranked first among the evaluated methods on the Olympus benchmark. It achieved the best average ranks for typical performance (average rank 1.53), worst-tail performance (1.21), and run-to-run variability (2.00), measured by median nAUC, CVaR_nAUC, and IQR_nAUC, respectively. Using the same default configuration, tidyHEBO also performed strongly on synthetic and Needle-in-a-Haystack problems and closely matched HEBO on Bayesmark (92.64 versus 93.34) while exceeding GP with logarithmic expected improvement and random search. Adaptive batching reduced feedback rounds while revealing a controllable trade-off between parallelization and optimization quality as the batch cap increased. These results characterize tidyHEBO as a robust, reproducible general-purpose optimizer for a broad range of practical optimization problems, including scientific applications and hyperparameter tuning.
Abstract:Bayesian optimization (BO) is widely used for expensive black-box problems, yet practical performance depends not only on high-level algorithmic choices but also on how surrogate model training, input and output warping transformations, acquisition functions, and candidate search are implemented. We present tidyHEBO, a BoTorch-native single-objective optimizer designed for robust general-purpose optimization. tidyHEBO jointly fits Yeo-Johnson output warping with the Gaussian-process surrogate, evaluates acquisition functions on the original objective scale using deterministic quadrature or MC-samples, and performs constrained cumulative Pareto search over multiple acquisition criteria. Without any Olympus-specific hyperparameter tuning - using only default optimizer configurations - tidyHEBO ranked first among the evaluated methods on the Olympus benchmark. It achieved the best average ranks for typical performance (average rank 1.53), worst-tail performance (1.21), and run-to-run variability (2.00), measured by median nAUC, CVaR_nAUC, and IQR_nAUC, respectively. Using the same default configuration, tidyHEBO also performed strongly on synthetic and Needle-in-a-Haystack problems and closely matched HEBO on Bayesmark (92.64 versus 93.34) while exceeding GP with logarithmic expected improvement and random search. Adaptive batching reduced feedback rounds while revealing a controllable trade-off between parallelization and optimization quality as the batch cap increased. These results characterize tidyHEBO as a robust, reproducible general-purpose optimizer for a broad range of practical optimization problems, including scientific applications and hyperparameter tuning.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.10669 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.10669v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.10669 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

Taboo “equilibrium”: Less confused frames for research on AI bargaining
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

Post-Train NVIDIA Cosmos 3 in One Day Using Agent Skills
NVIDIA · Jul 14, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026