aiqbench analysis
This study identifies a structural shift in software engineering knowledge production where generative AI disproportionately erodes easy, data-rich questions while complex, data-scarce domains persist. The findings suggest that collective repositories are becoming less accessible to novices as the baseline of "easy" problems is automated away, fundamentally altering how technical expertise is shared and acquired online.
The Uneven Decline of Collective Knowledge Production: Evidence from Stack Overflow After Generative AI
arXiv:2609.36069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI (Gen AI) is reshaping how individuals learn and work, but its consequences for collective knowledge, the shared body of knowledge that online communities produce together, remain poorly understood. Prior work has documented an aggregate decline in participation on knowledge-sharing platforms, but it remains unclear which specific kinds of knowledge are being lost first. We study this question using Stack Overflow, one of the largest online communities for software engineering, treating the release of ChatGPT-3.5 as a natural shock. Analyzing over two million questions posted between 2020 and 2025, we track how two dimensions of collective knowledge, difficulty and data availability, change following Gen AI's release. Using diverse methods and robust checks, we find consistent patterns. Easy questions decline sharply while difficult questions become more common, a pattern corroborated by rising code complexity. Data-rich topics and tags lose share of questions, while data-scarce ones gain ground. The two dimensions also interact: the decline in easy questions is concentrated specifically within data-rich domains, while difficult questions increase regardless of data availability. This pattern extends beyond Python across programming languages, with more prevalent languages showing sharper shifts. Together, our findings reveal that Gen AI's impact on collective knowledge is uneven, eroding easy, accessible knowledge first while more complex, less common knowledge persists.
Abstract:Generative AI (Gen AI) is reshaping how individuals learn and work, but its consequences for collective knowledge, the shared body of knowledge that online communities produce together, remain poorly understood. Prior work has documented an aggregate decline in participation on knowledge-sharing platforms, but it remains unclear which specific kinds of knowledge are being lost first. We study this question using Stack Overflow, one of the largest online communities for software engineering, treating the release of ChatGPT-3.5 as a natural shock. Analyzing over two million questions posted between 2020 and 2025, we track how two dimensions of collective knowledge, difficulty and data availability, change following Gen AI's release. Using diverse methods and robust checks, we find consistent patterns. Easy questions decline sharply while difficult questions become more common, a pattern corroborated by rising code complexity. Data-rich topics and tags lose share of questions, while data-scarce ones gain ground. The two dimensions also interact: the decline in easy questions is concentrated specifically within data-rich domains, while difficult questions increase regardless of data availability. This pattern extends beyond Python across programming languages, with more prevalent languages showing sharper shifts. Together, our findings reveal that Gen AI's impact on collective knowledge is uneven, eroding easy, accessible knowledge first while more complex, less common knowledge persists.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
arXiv:2609.36069 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2609.36069v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36069 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
Related coverage

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · Sep 19, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 18, 2026