aiqbench analysis
This research establishes that for single-copy quantum bandits, spectral measurements combined with classical KL-UCB achieve asymptotic instance optimality, proving that adaptive measurement design or storing copies offers no further improvement in the leading regret coefficient. The study rigorously demonstrates an exact collapse between quantum relative entropy and classical spectral statistics, defining precise regret floors that coincide only when specific commutation conditions are met. Any potential gains beyond this limit would require moving outside the single-copy measurement class entirely.
The Single-Copy Quantum Bandit Is Classical: An Exact Spectral Collapse
arXiv:2609.40339v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study multi-armed bandits whose arms supply unknown quantum states and whose mean rewards are defined by a known effect $F$. Each fresh copy may be measured by an arbitrary, adaptively chosen POVM. We prove an exact collapse: the measured relative entropy from an arm state to its confusing reward half-space equals the classical Burnetas-Katehakis functional of $F$'s spectral statistics, and the spectral measurement of $F$ together with an explicit least-favorable state, built from the derivative of the matrix logarithm, forms a saddle point of the underlying measurement game. Consequently, spectral measurement followed by classical KL-UCB is asymptotically instance-optimal among all consistent single-copy policies, in every finite dimension and for every reward effect under the stated nondegeneracy assumptions: adaptive and randomized measurement design cannot improve the leading logarithmic regret coefficient, and neither can storing copies for later single-copy measurement. A self-contained finite-time bound covers general effects and boundary distributions. Any further improvement must come from measurements outside the single-copy class. For consistent policies with arbitrary quantum memory, an amortized relative-entropy argument gives a converse with the Umegaki half-space divergence, and the two per-arm regret floors, $1/K_{\mathrm{inf}}$ and $1/D_{\mathrm{inf}}$, coincide if and only if the arm commutes with $F$. Whether the Umegaki floor is attainable involves a composite quantum Stein problem and a separate reduction to adaptive regret; we pose it as an open problem, with two-copy numerical evidence.
Abstract:We study multi-armed bandits whose arms supply unknown quantum states and whose mean rewards are defined by a known effect $F$. Each fresh copy may be measured by an arbitrary, adaptively chosen POVM. We prove an exact collapse: the measured relative entropy from an arm state to its confusing reward half-space equals the classical Burnetas-Katehakis functional of $F$'s spectral statistics, and the spectral measurement of $F$ together with an explicit least-favorable state, built from the derivative of the matrix logarithm, forms a saddle point of the underlying measurement game. Consequently, spectral measurement followed by classical KL-UCB is asymptotically instance-optimal among all consistent single-copy policies, in every finite dimension and for every reward effect under the stated nondegeneracy assumptions: adaptive and randomized measurement design cannot improve the leading logarithmic regret coefficient, and neither can storing copies for later single-copy measurement. A self-contained finite-time bound covers general effects and boundary distributions. Any further improvement must come from measurements outside the single-copy class. For consistent policies with arbitrary quantum memory, an amortized relative-entropy argument gives a converse with the Umegaki half-space divergence, and the two per-arm regret floors, $1/K_{\mathrm{inf}}$ and $1/D_{\mathrm{inf}}$, coincide if and only if the arm commutes with $F$. Whether the Umegaki floor is attainable involves a composite quantum Stein problem and a separate reduction to adaptive regret; we pose it as an open problem, with two-copy numerical evidence.
G.3; I.2.6; H.1.1
arXiv:2609.40339 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.40339v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40339 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 322 words
Related coverage

Illinois Quantum Memory Chip Stores 20 Photons Past Microsecond on Commercial Telecom Platform
techtimes.com · Oct 15, 2026

Quantum Measurement, How Reading a Qubit Works
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026

Richard Hamming, The Man Who Made Computers Reliable
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 17, 2026

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026