Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates that the widespread use of large language models as writing assistants significantly homogenizes linguistic styles, reducing complexity variance by 21-50% across diverse datasets. By prioritizing conformity over individuality, LLMs risk eroding the psychological and sociological insights encoded in unique human expression, which could negatively impact fields like healthcare diagnostics and cultural preservation. The findings highlight a critical trade-off between the efficiency of AI-assisted writing and the long-term value of linguistic diversity for societal understanding.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Shrinking Landscape of Linguistic Diversity in the Age of Large Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2502.11266v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language is far more than a communication tool; it encodes a wealth of information about a person's identity, psychological state, and social context, providing valuable insights for diverse fields including psychology, marketing, and healthcare. Across three studies spanning seven datasets in different domains and over 880,000 texts, we show that the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) as writing assistants is linked to declines in linguistic diversity, interfering with the societal and psychological insights language provides. While core content is retained when LLMs polish and rewrite texts, LLMs also homogenize writing styles, reducing writing-complexity variance by a statistically significant 21-50% across datasets and models (p <= .05), and amplify patterns associated with dominant characteristics while suppressing others, emphasizing conformity over individuality. These trends hold across different LLMs, prompts, and contexts, with potential implications for diagnostic processes, personalization efforts, hiring assessments, and cultural preservation.

Abstract:Language is far more than a communication tool; it encodes a wealth of information about a person's identity, psychological state, and social context, providing valuable insights for diverse fields including psychology, marketing, and healthcare. Across three studies spanning seven datasets in different domains and over 880,000 texts, we show that the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) as writing assistants is linked to declines in linguistic diversity, interfering with the societal and psychological insights language provides. While core content is retained when LLMs polish and rewrite texts, LLMs also homogenize writing styles, reducing writing-complexity variance by a statistically significant 21-50% across datasets and models (p <= .05), and amplify patterns associated with dominant characteristics while suppressing others, emphasizing conformity over individuality. These trends hold across different LLMs, prompts, and contexts, with potential implications for diagnostic processes, personalization efforts, hiring assessments, and cultural preservation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2502.11266 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2502.11266v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.11266 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02550-0 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage