Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents a foundational theoretical argument asserting that the complex structure in quantum mechanics is not merely nominal but a strict requirement for time evolution under energy conservation. The authors clarify that while real-valued formulations exist, they are essentially representations of complex linear algebra rather than true alternatives to complex numbers. This work addresses core mathematical and philosophical questions regarding the necessary algebraic structures underlying quantum theory.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Zeitgeist, Cybersecurity News
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Requirement of (at least) Complex Structure for Quantum Mechanics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.23041v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: It is argued that many real-valued constructions of quantum mechanics are only \emph{nominally} real in that the operators and states are restricted to impose a \emph{complex structure} on the Hilbert space. That is, complex algebra between pairs of elements representing complex numbers is preserved in these formulations. It is therefore mistaken to think of these constructions as being `real' as they are actually a representation of complex linear algebra. It is then shown that under the assumptions of state normalisation and strict energy conservation, this complex structure (at the very least) is required to allow for time evolution in quantum mechanics. This is only a \emph{minimum} requirement, as our arguments do not preclude the formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of hyper-complex entities, such as quaternions.

Abstract:It is argued that many real-valued constructions of quantum mechanics are only \emph{nominally} real in that the operators and states are restricted to impose a \emph{complex structure} on the Hilbert space. That is, complex algebra between pairs of elements representing complex numbers is preserved in these formulations. It is therefore mistaken to think of these constructions as being `real' as they are actually a representation of complex linear algebra. It is then shown that under the assumptions of state normalisation and strict energy conservation, this complex structure (at the very least) is required to allow for time evolution in quantum mechanics. This is only a \emph{minimum} requirement, as our arguments do not preclude the formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of hyper-complex entities, such as quaternions.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

arXiv:2609.23041 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.23041v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23041 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words

Related coverage