Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Policy

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes the REAL Rating framework, a six-tier disclosure system designed to move beyond binary labels by quantifying the specific extent of AI involvement in both content creation and user experience. By addressing the limitations of current watermarking and simple human-vs-AI distinctions, this methodology offers a standardized approach for transparency across text, image, audio, video, and software products. It represents a significant step forward in establishing clear provenance standards as generative AI becomes deeply integrated into public workflows.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Reported Engagement with AI Level (REAL) Rating: A Framework for Disclosing Human-AI Collaboration

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.04021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence has become increasingly incorporated into digital media and more generally into production workflows with which the public frequently interacts. Current provenance standards and disclosure methods frequently rely on binary categorizations, differentiating only between entirely human-authored and AI-generated content, or depend on technical watermarking that lacks user-facing clarity. However, there are very different risks and outcomes depending on the different uses of AI in the creation and consumption of end products. Therefore, we propose the Reported Engagement with AI Level (REAL) Rating framework which addresses these concerns by introducing a six-tier scale (Levels 0-5) that discloses the extent of AI involvement in both product creation and user experience. This paper details the structural methodology of the REAL Rating system and the specifics of its application across text, image, audio, video, and software products.

Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence has become increasingly incorporated into digital media and more generally into production workflows with which the public frequently interacts. Current provenance standards and disclosure methods frequently rely on binary categorizations, differentiating only between entirely human-authored and AI-generated content, or depend on technical watermarking that lacks user-facing clarity. However, there are very different risks and outcomes depending on the different uses of AI in the creation and consumption of end products. Therefore, we propose the Reported Engagement with AI Level (REAL) Rating framework which addresses these concerns by introducing a six-tier scale (Levels 0-5) that discloses the extent of AI involvement in both product creation and user experience. This paper details the structural methodology of the REAL Rating system and the specifics of its application across text, image, audio, video, and software products.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.04021 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.04021v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage