aiqbench analysis
This study resolves a long-standing conjecture regarding the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality by proving that its supremum is unattainable within any finite-dimensional quantum system. The authors demonstrate that achieving this limit necessitates an infinite local Hilbert space dimension, revealing that the set of finite-dimensional quantum correlations is not closed in this specific scenario. Furthermore, the rigorous proof was formalized in Lean 4, highlighting the growing intersection between advanced mathematical physics and automated theorem proving in quantum information theory.
The quantum supremum of the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality is not attained in finite dimension
arXiv:2608.29734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In 2010, P\'al and V\'ertesi found a family of finite-dimensional strategies for the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality whose optimized values appeared to converge as the local Hilbert-space dimension grew. They conjectured that this limit is the supremum over all finite-dimensional quantum strategies, but that no finite-dimensional strategy attains it. We prove both claims. The proof uses the symmetry of the Bell functional to associate every strategy with a finite matrix of probabilities, one for each pair of spectral subspaces of Alice and Bob. This matrix gives an upper bound on the Bell value, and finite-dimensional strategies built from the repeating structure found by P\'al and V\'ertesi approach it as the dimension grows. If the bound were attained exactly in finite dimension, the optimality conditions would then require a state that cannot be normalized. Consequently, the set of finite-dimensional quantum correlations is not closed in the $(3,3,2,2)$ scenario, the smallest Bell scenario where this can happen. Moreover, approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension. The core of the proof was formalized in Lean~4.
Abstract:In 2010, Pál and Vértesi found a family of finite-dimensional strategies for the $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality whose optimized values appeared to converge as the local Hilbert-space dimension grew. They conjectured that this limit is the supremum over all finite-dimensional quantum strategies, but that no finite-dimensional strategy attains it. We prove both claims. The proof uses the symmetry of the Bell functional to associate every strategy with a finite matrix of probabilities, one for each pair of spectral subspaces of Alice and Bob. This matrix gives an upper bound on the Bell value, and finite-dimensional strategies built from the repeating structure found by Pál and Vértesi approach it as the dimension grows. If the bound were attained exactly in finite dimension, the optimality conditions would then require a state that cannot be normalized. Consequently, the set of finite-dimensional quantum correlations is not closed in the $(3,3,2,2)$ scenario, the smallest Bell scenario where this can happen. Moreover, approaching the supremum requires unbounded local dimension. The core of the proof was formalized in Lean~4.
arXiv:2608.29734 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.29734v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29734 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words
Related coverage
The I3322 quantum value is attained spatially but not in finite dimension
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026
The $I_{3322}$ Bell inequality requires infinite dimensions
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026
Finite Weyl polynomials and the approach to Tsirelson's bound in relativistic scalar quantum field theory
arXiv · Aug 24, 2026
Direct Adaptive Certification of High-Dimensional Entanglement with Bell Tests
arXiv · Aug 31, 2026