aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes a fundamental theoretical link between Shannon entropy, Fisher information, and quantum kinetic energy by framing them as measures of correlation under a specific probability map. The authors propose a "principle of minimum justified correlation," suggesting that physical systems naturally select states with the least correlation given their constraints, a concept relevant to foundational quantum mechanics and statistical inference. While the abstract notes AI was used in the research process, the core contribution is a deep mathematical insight into quantum physics rather than an application of machine learning or AI technology.
The Principle of Minimum Justified Correlation
arXiv:2609.38124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: It is shown that Shannon entropy, Fisher information, and quantum-mechanical kinetic energy may all be viewed as measures of correlation. We begin with a fundamental correlation-destroying map: a joint probability density $\rho(x,y)$ is replaced by $\rho_x(x)\rho_y(y)$, the product of its marginal distributions. In the discrete case, Shannon's entropy is nondecreasing under this map. For continuous distributions, this fundamental map leads to a well-behaved, coordinate-invariant correlation measure, analogous to the discrete Shannon entropy: \[ I[\rho] = h[\rho_x] + h[\rho_y] - h[\rho]. \] In the continuous case, however, another measure appears: Fisher information. The relative Fisher information $J(\rho\|\rho_x\rho_y)$ behaves similarly under the fundamental map. For a normalized real quantum wavefunction, this decrease is exactly proportional to the decrease in mean kinetic energy, \[ \langle T\rangle_\psi - \langle T\rangle_\Phi = \frac{\hbar^2}{8m} J(\rho\|\rho_x\rho_y), \qquad \Phi = \sqrt{\rho_x \rho_y}. \] In Jaynes's language, the result supports a principle of minimum justified correlation: given physical constraints and a set of possible distributions or related amplitudes satisfying those constraints, select from that set those with the least correlation. This is Part I of a two-part paper. Here we develop the entropy, Fisher-information, and kinetic-energy identities above, and state the principle they support. Part II addresses questions which Part I raises but leaves unanswered: multiple solutions, time dependence, the role of spin, a route to the Schr\"odinger equation itself, and a proposed experimental test. AI has been used.
Abstract:It is shown that Shannon entropy, Fisher information, and quantum-mechanical kinetic energy may all be viewed as measures of correlation. We begin with a fundamental correlation-destroying map: a joint probability density $\rho(x,y)$ is replaced by $\rho_x(x)\rho_y(y)$, the product of its marginal distributions. In the discrete case, Shannon's entropy is nondecreasing under this map. For continuous distributions, this fundamental map leads to a well-behaved, coordinate-invariant correlation measure, analogous to the discrete Shannon entropy: \[ I[\rho] = h[\rho_x] + h[\rho_y] - h[\rho]. \] In the continuous case, however, another measure appears: Fisher information. The relative Fisher information $J(\rho\|\rho_x\rho_y)$ behaves similarly under the fundamental map. For a normalized real quantum wavefunction, this decrease is exactly proportional to the decrease in mean kinetic energy, \[ \langle T\rangle_\psi - \langle T\rangle_\Phi = \frac{\hbar^2}{8m} J(\rho\|\rho_x\rho_y), \qquad \Phi = \sqrt{\rho_x \rho_y}. \] In Jaynes's language, the result supports a principle of minimum justified correlation: given physical constraints and a set of possible distributions or related amplitudes satisfying those constraints, select from that set those with the least correlation. This is Part I of a two-part paper. Here we develop the entropy, Fisher-information, and kinetic-energy identities above, and state the principle they support. Part II addresses questions which Part I raises but leaves unanswered: multiple solutions, time dependence, the role of spin, a route to the Schrödinger equation itself, and a proposed experimental test. AI has been used.
Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2609.38124 [cond-mat.stat-mech]
(or arXiv:2609.38124v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38124 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 327 words
Related coverage
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026

How to Choose Full-Stack Observability for NVIDIA AI Factories
NVIDIA · Aug 12, 2026
When are safe Pareto improvements individually rational?
LessWrong · Oct 13, 2026
For Love of the Lightcone, Don't Partisanize AI Safety
LessWrong · Sep 17, 2026