Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses top-$K$ joint-arm identification in multi-agent systems where agents operate without direct communication, deriving tight statistical bounds on the sample complexity penalties incurred by removing coordination channels. The study quantifies how different observability regimes impact performance, establishing that full asymmetry imposes a fixed multiplicative penalty on sample requirements while proving optimality for shared-reward scenarios up to logarithmic factors. These findings are critical for designing scalable cooperative AI systems that must function under strict privacy or bandwidth constraints.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Price of Decentralization in Top-$K$ Arm Identification

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.22120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cooperative teams often need to agree on the best few options rather than simply accumulate reward, and they must do so while each member sees only a fragment of the team's collective experience. We study this as top-$K$ joint-arm identification in multi-agent multi-armed bandits: at every round $M$ agents simultaneously choose individual actions that compose a joint arm, and the team must ultimately return the $K$ joint arms of highest mean reward. The difficulty is that an agent may not observe the actions of others, their rewards, or either. We treat three observability regimes---(A) shared rewards with hidden actions, (B) observed actions with private rewards, and (C) full asymmetry---and design communication-free elimination algorithms (UCB-Intervals) that reconstruct implicit coordination from whatever signal each regime leaves intact: a shared arm ordering in (A), observable deviations in (B), and enlarged confidence radii under (C). We give matching analyses in both the fixed-budget and fixed-confidence objectives, then fold all three regimes into a single meta-guarantee indexed by a multiplicity $c$ and a consensus factor $\rho$. Our central result is quantitative rather than merely algorithmic: change-of-measure lower bounds show that shared-reward identification is optimal up to one universal logarithmic factor, and that the entire statistical price of removing communication is a multiplicative $\rho^2$ in sample complexity---a fixed $4\times$ penalty under full asymmetry. The resulting stopping time scales as $O\!\left(\sum_{\mathbf{a}} \frac{\log(A^M/\delta)}{\Delta_{\mathbf{a}}^2}\right)$ and the fixed-budget error as $\exp(-\Theta(T/H_1))$, with the dependence on the joint-action count $A^M$ shown to be unavoidable.

Abstract:Cooperative teams often need to agree on the best few options rather than simply accumulate reward, and they must do so while each member sees only a fragment of the team's collective experience. We study this as top-$K$ joint-arm identification in multi-agent multi-armed bandits: at every round $M$ agents simultaneously choose individual actions that compose a joint arm, and the team must ultimately return the $K$ joint arms of highest mean reward. The difficulty is that an agent may not observe the actions of others, their rewards, or either. We treat three observability regimes---(A) shared rewards with hidden actions, (B) observed actions with private rewards, and (C) full asymmetry---and design communication-free elimination algorithms (UCB-Intervals) that reconstruct implicit coordination from whatever signal each regime leaves intact: a shared arm ordering in (A), observable deviations in (B), and enlarged confidence radii under (C). We give matching analyses in both the fixed-budget and fixed-confidence objectives, then fold all three regimes into a single meta-guarantee indexed by a multiplicity $c$ and a consensus factor $\rho$. Our central result is quantitative rather than merely algorithmic: change-of-measure lower bounds show that shared-reward identification is optimal up to one universal logarithmic factor, and that the entire statistical price of removing communication is a multiplicative $\rho^2$ in sample complexity---a fixed $4\times$ penalty under full asymmetry. The resulting stopping time scales as $O\!\left(\sum_{\mathbf{a}} \frac{\log(A^M/\delta)}{\Delta_{\mathbf{a}}^2}\right)$ and the fixed-budget error as $\exp(-\Theta(T/H_1))$, with the dependence on the joint-action count $A^M$ shown to be unavoidable.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.22120 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.22120v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22120 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words

Related coverage