aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes the minimax optimal rate for estimating second-order calibration error in binary classification under small perturbations, providing finite-sample guarantees for improved uncertainty quantification. By introducing specific noise to score coordinates, the authors derive an analytic framework that recalibrates both mean predictions and epistemic variance estimates with explicit constants. The work advances theoretical foundations for higher-order predictors, offering a rigorous post-hoc procedure to align predicted uncertainties with actual conditional variances.
The Minimax Rate of Perturbed Second-Order Calibration
arXiv:2605.07808v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Second-order calibration error quantifies how closely a higher-order predictor's epistemic-uncertainty estimate matches the conditional variance of the label probability on its level sets. We characterize the minimax rate of estimating the second-order calibration error for binary classification in the regime where a small perturbation is applied to the classifier outputs. Our procedure is simple: add independent bandwidth-$h$ sech noise to the score coordinates, then regress $Y^{(1)}$ and $Y^{(1)}Y^{(2)}$ on the perturbed score using low-degree polynomials. Crucially, the sech perturbation makes the calibration functions analytic in a suitable strip. The resulting estimator has error $O_h(\log^{3/2}n/\sqrt n)$, with explicit constants. In the same setting, a matching $\Omega(1/\sqrt{n})$ lower bound establishes minimax optimality up to logarithmic factors. As a corollary, we give a finite-sample guarantee for perturbed second-order Platt scaling, yielding a post-hoc procedure that recalibrates both the mean prediction and the epistemic-variance estimate of the perturbed higher-order predictor. Along the way, we give an explicit two-moment formulation of second-order calibration error and relate it quantitatively to the bucketed formulation of Ahdritz et al. [2025]. Our experiments confirm the predicted rate and the quality of the recalibrated uncertainties.
Abstract:Second-order calibration error quantifies how closely a higher-order predictor's epistemic-uncertainty estimate matches the conditional variance of the label probability on its level sets. We characterize the minimax rate of estimating the second-order calibration error for binary classification in the regime where a small perturbation is applied to the classifier outputs. Our procedure is simple: add independent bandwidth-$h$ sech noise to the score coordinates, then regress $Y^{(1)}$ and $Y^{(1)}Y^{(2)}$ on the perturbed score using low-degree polynomials. Crucially, the sech perturbation makes the calibration functions analytic in a suitable strip. The resulting estimator has error $O_h(\log^{3/2}n/\sqrt n)$, with explicit constants. In the same setting, a matching $\Omega(1/\sqrt{n})$ lower bound establishes minimax optimality up to logarithmic factors. As a corollary, we give a finite-sample guarantee for perturbed second-order Platt scaling, yielding a post-hoc procedure that recalibrates both the mean prediction and the epistemic-variance estimate of the perturbed higher-order predictor. Along the way, we give an explicit two-moment formulation of second-order calibration error and relate it quantitatively to the bucketed formulation of Ahdritz et al. [2025]. Our experiments confirm the predicted rate and the quality of the recalibrated uncertainties.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.07808 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.07808v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.07808 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words
Related coverage
Matched Queries for Curvature and Density at Branching Junctions
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
The Signed Geometry of One-Shot Recourse: On-Path Validity and the Signed-Curvature Criterion
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Introducing North Mini Code: Cohere’s First Model For Developers
Hugging Face · Jun 9, 2026

Examining AI Swarm Efficiency with the AI Futures Model
LessWrong · Oct 19, 2026