Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study establishes a quantitative link between the non-Gaussianity required for quantum advantage and the "magic cost" of generating fermionic randomness, demonstrating that reproducing random-matrix statistics necessitates resources scaling linearly with system size. The work provides an experimentally accessible witness via two-copy number fluctuations to verify these theoretical bounds on preparation costs and sampling hardness.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The magic cost of fermionic randomness

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.05093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sampling-based quantum advantage raises a basic resource question: how much non-Gaussianity is needed to reproduce the random-matrix statistics often associated with quantum chaos? Passive fermionic linear optics preserves Gaussian structure, and even Haar-random mode mixing fails to anticoncentrate for Slater inputs. We show that overcoming this obstruction requires an extensive input resource. For any pure half-filled input state, the one-body defect $\nu$, defined as the summed occupation variance of the natural orbitals, must scale linearly with system size. For products of bounded-size blocks on $4N$ modes, this condition is also sufficient, with normalized collision moment asymptotic to $2N/\nu$, compared with the Porter-Thomas value 2. For four-mode products, the full Porter-Thomas moment hierarchy is recovered precisely when the defect density tends to its maximum. Assuming average-case hardness, approximate classical sampling remains hard near maximal density, with an error tolerance that increases with the density. Two-copy number fluctuations measure $\nu$ directly, and the same quantity lower-bounds the combined cost of non-Gaussian resource modes and parity-preserving local gates in deterministic exact preparation. Fermionic randomness therefore carries an extensive magic cost, with a quantitative link between sampling statistics, preparation resources, and an experimentally accessible witness.

Abstract:Sampling-based quantum advantage raises a basic resource question: how much non-Gaussianity is needed to reproduce the random-matrix statistics often associated with quantum chaos? Passive fermionic linear optics preserves Gaussian structure, and even Haar-random mode mixing fails to anticoncentrate for Slater inputs. We show that overcoming this obstruction requires an extensive input resource. For any pure half-filled input state, the one-body defect $\nu$, defined as the summed occupation variance of the natural orbitals, must scale linearly with system size. For products of bounded-size blocks on $4N$ modes, this condition is also sufficient, with normalized collision moment asymptotic to $2N/\nu$, compared with the Porter-Thomas value 2. For four-mode products, the full Porter-Thomas moment hierarchy is recovered precisely when the defect density tends to its maximum. Assuming average-case hardness, approximate classical sampling remains hard near maximal density, with an error tolerance that increases with the density. Two-copy number fluctuations measure $\nu$ directly, and the same quantity lower-bounds the combined cost of non-Gaussian resource modes and parity-preserving local gates in deterministic exact preparation. Fermionic randomness therefore carries an extensive magic cost, with a quantitative link between sampling statistics, preparation resources, and an experimentally accessible witness.

arXiv:2610.05093 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.05093v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05093 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words

Related coverage