Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper investigates the structural requirements of the low-individual-degree test within quantum complexity theory, demonstrating that the diagonal-lines subtest is essential for maintaining soundness when specific compatibility mechanisms are altered. The authors provide a counterexample showing that removing this test without additional constraints fails to preserve the necessary properties for proving MIP*=RE. Consequently, the work refines our understanding of the rigorous boundaries required in quantum interactive proof systems and complexity class proofs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Low-Individual-Degree Test Without the Diagonal-Lines Test Is Not Quantum-Sound

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.12346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To prove the quantum soundness of the classical low-individual-degree test, the authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} defined three subtests, namely the axis-parallel lines test, the self-consistency test, and the diagonal-lines test. An interesting question is whether the diagonal-lines test can be removed. In this paper, we show that the diagonal-lines test cannot simply be removed without another compatibility mechanism. Consequently, replacing the "conditional linear functions" by "coordinate deletion functions" in the proof of MIP*=RE, as mentioned in \cite{JNVWY20LID}, does not by itself preserve the required soundness. The authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} found an example that requires the diagonal-lines test when \((m, d, q) = (2, 2, 4)\); we give an example when \((m, d) = (2, 2)\) and \(q\) is any odd prime.

Abstract:To prove the quantum soundness of the classical low-individual-degree test, the authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} defined three subtests, namely the axis-parallel lines test, the self-consistency test, and the diagonal-lines test. An interesting question is whether the diagonal-lines test can be removed. In this paper, we show that the diagonal-lines test cannot simply be removed without another compatibility mechanism. Consequently, replacing the "conditional linear functions" by "coordinate deletion functions" in the proof of MIP*=RE, as mentioned in \cite{JNVWY20LID}, does not by itself preserve the required soundness. The authors of \cite{JNVWY20LID} found an example that requires the diagonal-lines test when \((m, d, q) = (2, 2, 4)\); we give an example when \((m, d) = (2, 2)\) and \(q\) is any odd prime.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)

arXiv:2609.12346 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.12346v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12346 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 217 words

Related coverage