Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper uses motion tokenization, a standard sequence-modeling technique, as a diagnostic to test whether gaze data transfers across datasets. Its main finding is that the same tokens can form different local transition patterns in different domains, so naively pooling gaze datasets can hurt. For ML readers, the useful point is that a shared token vocabulary does not imply shared sequence dynamics, which matters for any pretraining or pooling strategy on behavioral data.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Language of Looking: Motion Tokens Reveal Domain-Dependent Local Structure in Gaze Sequences

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.16565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human gaze is the primary high-bandwidth interface through which we parse the semantics of our environment. While often modeled as a sequence, the degree to which gaze exhibits transferable local structure across domains remains underexplored. Using motion tokenization as a diagnostic lens across four diverse datasets, we investigate the transferability of local sequence structure. We demonstrate that while gaze can share a reusable motion-token vocabulary, identical motion tokens are organized into different local transition patterns depending on the dataset and task context. Our results show the limitations of naive data-pooling under low-semantic motion-token representations and provide a framework for evaluating behavioral sequences through information-theoretic diagnostics.

Abstract:Human gaze is the primary high-bandwidth interface through which we parse the semantics of our environment. While often modeled as a sequence, the degree to which gaze exhibits transferable local structure across domains remains underexplored. Using motion tokenization as a diagnostic lens across four diverse datasets, we investigate the transferability of local sequence structure. We demonstrate that while gaze can share a reusable motion-token vocabulary, identical motion tokens are organized into different local transition patterns depending on the dataset and task context. Our results show the limitations of naive data-pooling under low-semantic motion-token representations and provide a framework for evaluating behavioral sequences through information-theoretic diagnostics.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.16565 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.16565v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16565 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 199 words

Related coverage