Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes that the Kikuchi hierarchy achieves optimal detection, recovery, and refutation bounds for sparse $k$-XOR problems without previous polylogarithmic losses. The study further demonstrates a quartic speedup in these tasks using quantum algorithms compared to classical spectral methods.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Kikuchi Hierarchy is Sharp for $k$XOR

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.29672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Planted noisy $k$XOR and the strong refutation of random $k$XOR are governed by a conjectured trade-off between signal strength and time: Level $\ell$ of the Kikuchi hierarchy should achieve the smooth curve \begin{equation*} m\ \gtrsim\ \rho^{-2}n^{k/2}/\ell^{k/2-1}\ \text{clauses} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \text{solvable in time }n^{O(\ell)}, \end{equation*} where $\rho$ is the bias of the planted signal or, for refutation, the target advantage. However, every spectral analysis of sparse $k$XOR to date loses polylogarithmic factors against this curve, a loss that enters the exponent of the running time. We show that a normalized variant of the Kikuchi hierarchy achieves the sharp conjectured trade-off, with no logarithmic loss, at every arity $k\ge3$. At the scale above, our algorithms achieve strong detection, weak recovery, and strong refutation; an additional cleanup step boosts weak recovery to exact recovery, and the refutation certificates yield sum-of-squares proofs of degree $O_k(\ell)$. We also prove matching lower bounds in the same model. The inference and refutation upper bounds transfer to more general planting laws and predicates. Finally, we give a quantum algorithm that achieves a quartic speedup over the classical spectral algorithms for detection and weak recovery. The proofs rest on two key ingredients: a normalization of the sparse Kikuchi matrix, and a sharp count of the closed walks in its trace expansion. We use a closely related trace-walk count to prove Feige's 2008 hypergraph Moore bound conjecture in a companion paper.

Abstract:Planted noisy $k$XOR and the strong refutation of random $k$XOR are governed by a conjectured trade-off between signal strength and time: Level $\ell$ of the Kikuchi hierarchy should achieve the smooth curve \begin{equation*} m\ \gtrsim\ \rho^{-2}n^{k/2}/\ell^{k/2-1}\ \text{clauses} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \text{solvable in time }n^{O(\ell)}, \end{equation*} where $\rho$ is the bias of the planted signal or, for refutation, the target advantage. However, every spectral analysis of sparse $k$XOR to date loses polylogarithmic factors against this curve, a loss that enters the exponent of the running time. We show that a normalized variant of the Kikuchi hierarchy achieves the sharp conjectured trade-off, with no logarithmic loss, at every arity $k\ge3$. At the scale above, our algorithms achieve strong detection, weak recovery, and strong refutation; an additional cleanup step boosts weak recovery to exact recovery, and the refutation certificates yield sum-of-squares proofs of degree $O_k(\ell)$. We also prove matching lower bounds in the same model. The inference and refutation upper bounds transfer to more general planting laws and predicates. Finally, we give a quantum algorithm that achieves a quartic speedup over the classical spectral algorithms for detection and weak recovery. The proofs rest on two key ingredients: a normalization of the sparse Kikuchi matrix, and a sharp count of the closed walks in its trace expansion. We use a closely related trace-walk count to prove Feige's 2008 hypergraph Moore bound conjecture in a companion paper.

Companion paper to arXiv:2607.26028

Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2607.29672 [cs.DS]

(or arXiv:2607.29672v1 [cs.DS] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29672 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 336 words

Related coverage