Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This autoethnographic case study documents a professional interpreter using LLMs and a coding agent to build a local-first real-time translation support tool, then deploying it at a live scientific event. The reported result of a 0.94 s median latency over 971 utterances is a single-deployment measurement, so it shows feasibility rather than general performance. The more transferable insight is the workflow, where domain experts keep design control while AI handles implementation, which matters for anyone building or evaluating AI tools for specialized professional users.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The interpreter as developer: An autoethnographic design study of building a computer-assisted interpreting tool through human-LLM co-creation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.16460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-time AI captioning now serves audiences at multilingual events, yet computer-assisted interpreting (CAI) tools are still built for interpreters, rarely by them. This article reports an autoethnographic design study in which a professional interpreter with no programming training built a local-first CAI system through expert-led 'vibe coding', co-creating with an LLM architect and a coding agent. Analysis of the complete development dialogues shows how tacit professional knowledge, from segmentation to booth infrastructure, was externalized into design after generic defaults failed in use. In a demanding public scientific event, three mechanisms of in-booth appropriation emerge under a firmly human-led division of labor; telemetry from a first fully instrumented assignment shows a fully local chain sustaining a median translation latency of 0.94 s across 971 utterances. The case is read as lead-user innovation newly enabled by generative AI, with implications for the technological literacy of interpreters and the future of interpreter training.

Abstract:Real-time AI captioning now serves audiences at multilingual events, yet computer-assisted interpreting (CAI) tools are still built for interpreters, rarely by them. This article reports an autoethnographic design study in which a professional interpreter with no programming training built a local-first CAI system through expert-led 'vibe coding', co-creating with an LLM architect and a coding agent. Analysis of the complete development dialogues shows how tacit professional knowledge, from segmentation to booth infrastructure, was externalized into design after generic defaults failed in use. In a demanding public scientific event, three mechanisms of in-booth appropriation emerge under a firmly human-led division of labor; telemetry from a first fully instrumented assignment shows a fully local chain sustaining a median translation latency of 0.94 s across 971 utterances. The case is read as lead-user innovation newly enabled by generative AI, with implications for the technological literacy of interpreters and the future of interpreter training.

14 pages, 2 figures. The CAI tool is openly available at this https URL and archived at Zenodo, DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22255011

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.16460 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.16460v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16460 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words

Related coverage