aiqbench analysis
This theoretical study establishes the $\gamma$-graph dimension as a key metric for learnability, demonstrating that a simple median-based aggregation of three interpolating hypotheses outperforms proper learning methods in regression tasks. The research further reveals fundamental limits where certain hypothesis classes require infinite aggregations or non-interpolating rules to achieve basic performance levels.
The Interplay Between Interpolation and Aggregation in Regression: Optimal Sample Complexity
arXiv:2605.29819v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This work investigates theoretically the interplay between interpolation and aggregation in regression. We establish that the $\gamma$-graph dimension characterizes learnability for a broad class of natural aggregation procedures. Furthermore, we prove that an extremely simple aggregation procedure, combining three interpolating hypotheses via the median, is optimal among all these aggregation procedures, and is strictly more powerful than proper learning. Finally, we show that some hypothesis classes are learnable only by aggregating infinitely many hypotheses or by using non-interpolating aggregation rules (which may predict outside the range of their inputs), and any finite interpolating aggregation fails to achieve even trivial performance.
Abstract:This work investigates theoretically the interplay between interpolation and aggregation in regression. We establish that the $\gamma$-graph dimension characterizes learnability for a broad class of natural aggregation procedures. Furthermore, we prove that an extremely simple aggregation procedure, combining three interpolating hypotheses via the median, is optimal among all these aggregation procedures, and is strictly more powerful than proper learning. Finally, we show that some hypothesis classes are learnable only by aggregating infinitely many hypotheses or by using non-interpolating aggregation rules (which may predict outside the range of their inputs), and any finite interpolating aggregation fails to achieve even trivial performance.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.29819 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.29819v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29819 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 192 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Generalization and infinite width
LessWrong · Aug 1, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026
Approaching the Harm of Gradient Attacks While Only Flipping Labels
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026