Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research advances the theoretical foundations of machine learning by proving improved convergence rates for first-order convex optimization over specific geometric domains. By resolving an open question regarding nonsmooth objectives and linking optimization complexity to sequential fat-shattering dimensions, the work provides rigorous bounds that surpass classical rates under general assumptions. These findings are significant for understanding the limits of black-box optimization algorithms in high-dimensional settings.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The First-Order Oracle Complexity of Lipschitz Convex Optimization in Nondual Settings

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.20687v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study first-order black-box convex optimization over an $\ell_p$-ball for objectives Lipschitz in the $\ell_q$-norm, solving in the affirmative the nonsmooth version of the COLT open question (Guz15b) on whether the geometry of a smaller feasible set ($p < q$) can improve convergence rates in convex optimization, and matching prior lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. Our rates include \(\widetilde O(1/T)\) for convex Euclidean-Lipschitz optimization over the $\ell_1$-ball, improving on the $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ classical rate under general assumptions. The key technical device is a new online learning game, where the comparator is evaluated using the maximum of affine losses observed so far. We bound the value of this game above and below in terms of a combinatorial online learning quantity: the sequential fat-shattering dimension, which we characterize for the $\ell_p / \ell_q$ case. Our results generally apply when the feasible set $X$ and the set of possible subgradients $H$ are convex, centrally symmetric, and admit a type of minmax theorem, advancing on a fundamental question by Sridharan [Sri12, Section 10.1.2, Q3]. As a geometric consequence of our analysis, of independent interest, we obtain estimates for the expected distance of a convex hull of samples to their mean in several Banach geometries, a version of the celebrated Wendel's theorem (Wen62), but quantitative and for bounded general distributions as opposed to centrally symmetric ones.

Abstract:We study first-order black-box convex optimization over an $\ell_p$-ball for objectives Lipschitz in the $\ell_q$-norm, solving in the affirmative the nonsmooth version of the COLT open question (Guz15b) on whether the geometry of a smaller feasible set ($p < q$) can improve convergence rates in convex optimization, and matching prior lower bounds up to logarithmic factors. Our rates include \(\widetilde O(1/T)\) for convex Euclidean-Lipschitz optimization over the $\ell_1$-ball, improving on the $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ classical rate under general assumptions. The key technical device is a new online learning game, where the comparator is evaluated using the maximum of affine losses observed so far. We bound the value of this game above and below in terms of a combinatorial online learning quantity: the sequential fat-shattering dimension, which we characterize for the $\ell_p / \ell_q$ case. Our results generally apply when the feasible set $X$ and the set of possible subgradients $H$ are convex, centrally symmetric, and admit a type of minmax theorem, advancing on a fundamental question by Sridharan [Sri12, Section 10.1.2, Q3]. As a geometric consequence of our analysis, of independent interest, we obtain estimates for the expected distance of a convex hull of samples to their mean in several Banach geometries, a version of the celebrated Wendel's theorem (Wen62), but quantitative and for bounded general distributions as opposed to centrally symmetric ones.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.20687 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2609.20687v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20687 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words

Related coverage