Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study analyzes 25 years of Wikipedia editing data to determine if Large Language Models have fundamentally altered long-term trends in volunteer coordination and governance participation. The findings indicate that while short-term fluctuations exist, generative AI has not yet shifted the core trajectory of how collective intelligence systems operate or specialize their contributor bases. Consequently, the structural dynamics of open-source knowledge production remain driven by established human behavioral patterns rather than immediate LLM integration.
Sources coveringarXiv, Fortune, LessWrong, wahpetondailynews.com
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Evolution of Coordination in a Collective Intelligence System: 25 Years of English Wikipedia and the Emergence of Generative AI

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.16856v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: English Wikipedia is one of the largest examples of collective intelligence on the Web, sustained not only by article production but also by volunteer coordination and governance. While prior research has examined coordination work in Wikipedia, less attention has been paid to how participation in these spaces has evolved over time. Drawing on a longitudinal analysis spanning nearly 25 years of English Wikipedia, we examine editing patterns across five namespaces covering content, discussion, and governance. We find that participation in coordination spaces has declined relative to content production, particularly in governance areas, with a shrinking core of editors performing an increasing share of this work. Using Markov-based session metrics, we also find that editing has become more specialised, with editors moving less frequently between namespaces. Motivated by recent governance debates around generative AI, we conclude by investigating whether the availability of LLMs has altered these long-term trends. While short-term changes are visible, we find little evidence that generative AI fundamentally changed existing trajectories of coordination and participation.

Abstract:English Wikipedia is one of the largest examples of collective intelligence on the Web, sustained not only by article production but also by volunteer coordination and governance. While prior research has examined coordination work in Wikipedia, less attention has been paid to how participation in these spaces has evolved over time. Drawing on a longitudinal analysis spanning nearly 25 years of English Wikipedia, we examine editing patterns across five namespaces covering content, discussion, and governance. We find that participation in coordination spaces has declined relative to content production, particularly in governance areas, with a shrinking core of editors performing an increasing share of this work. Using Markov-based session metrics, we also find that editing has become more specialised, with editors moving less frequently between namespaces. Motivated by recent governance debates around generative AI, we conclude by investigating whether the availability of LLMs has altered these long-term trends. While short-term changes are visible, we find little evidence that generative AI fundamentally changed existing trajectories of coordination and participation.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)

arXiv:2609.16856 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2609.16856v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16856 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words

Related coverage