The Epistemics of Agent Memory: Measuring, and Governing, the Consolidation Decision in Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Abstract:Long-horizon LLM agents must convert accumulated experience into durable memory, deciding what to keep, compress, abstract into reusable skills and rules, or forget. We report a four-phase research program on this consolidation problem whose central finding is a shift in what is measured: from how much an agent remembers, to whether its consolidation decisions are any good, to whether those decisions can be trusted. Phase 1 learns episodic boundaries from agent traces by downstream utility; an honest near-miss (oracle correlation 0.691 vs a 0.70 bar) whose lasting output is a three-gate anti-leakage protocol. Phase 2 learns when to promote experience and to which abstraction level under a token budget, achieving a verified +22.7% task-success improvement with 7x compression, but exposing a degenerate-forgetting failure and a distribution-shift failure mode we name lambda-prevalence coupling. Phase 3 introduces ConsolidationBench, an oracle-by-construction benchmark that scores consolidation decisions against a known optimum on three non-circular axes; production retrieval systems retain information yet score zero on cross-level transfer. Phase 4 introduces governed consolidation: the decision wrapped in poison-resistance, reversibility, and auditability guarantees with a quality gate. Governance is statistically distinct from the quality score ($r^2 = 0.43$; partial $r = 0.27$; identical-quality policies differ threefold in governance), so the contribution survives independently of the metric's external validity. On that question we report a resolved negative: after a graded-reuse redesign removed a structural ceiling, a two-benchmark study with 2,532 real answer cells finds the quality score does not predict real transfer accuracy (pooled Spearman $\rho = -0.24$, n = 12, CI spanning zero). An adversarial self-critique pass cleared the final claim set with zero surviving overclaims.

13 pages, 4 tables, no figures. A four-phase research program. Experiments executed and adversarially verified by PRIMA (arXiv:2605.24775); per-phase result files and preregistrations available to reviewers on request; certain mechanism internals held under controlled release (see Section 7)

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

I.2.6; I.2.11; H.3.3; I.2.8

arXiv:2609.33013 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.33013v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33013 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)