aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel semantic-timescale analysis pipeline that quantifies temporal dependencies in speech using autocorrelation-window measures to distinguish between generic and specific vocabulary. By validating these features across human narratives, TTS, and LLM-generated text, the study demonstrates that ACW-based metrics capture non-trivial temporal organization beyond static lexical distributions. These interpretable time-series features offer a practical method for objectively comparing the semantic dynamics of human and AI-generated speech.
The Dynamics of Human and AI-Generated Language: How Semantics Fluctuates across Different Timescales
arXiv:2606.11371v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spoken language, whether produced by humans or large language models (LLM), unfolds over time with varying semantic content. However, we still lack simple, interpretable time-series features that capture how generic versus specific content is distributed over time, and that can be used to compare human and AI-generated speech. We introduce a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline that turns word-level transcripts with timestamps into semantic time-series. For each spoken narrative, we compute (i) semantic specificity using WordNet-based word depth and (ii) contextual similarity using SBERT embeddings and quantify their temporal dependence using autocorrelation-window measures (ACW-0 and related metrics). We then compare original speech to multiple shuffled controls that selectively disrupt lexical identity, temporal order, and word duration. Across human-read autobiographical narratives, TTS readings, and LLM-generated texts rendered with TTS, we find that segments with longer ACW-0 in the semantic time-series tend to contain more generic vocabulary, whereas segments with shorter ACW-0 are enriched in more specific words. These associations are strongly attenuated or abolished when word order and timing are randomized, indicating that ACW-based measures capture non-trivial temporal organization of semantic content beyond static lexical distributions. Our results suggest that ACW-based semantic timescales are a useful family of features for analyzing and comparing the temporal structure of human and AI-generated speech.
Abstract:Spoken language, whether produced by humans or large language models (LLM), unfolds over time with varying semantic content. However, we still lack simple, interpretable time-series features that capture how generic versus specific content is distributed over time, and that can be used to compare human and AI-generated speech. We introduce a semantic-timescale analysis pipeline that turns word-level transcripts with timestamps into semantic time-series. For each spoken narrative, we compute (i) semantic specificity using WordNet-based word depth and (ii) contextual similarity using SBERT embeddings and quantify their temporal dependence using autocorrelation-window measures (ACW-0 and related metrics). We then compare original speech to multiple shuffled controls that selectively disrupt lexical identity, temporal order, and word duration. Across human-read autobiographical narratives, TTS readings, and LLM-generated texts rendered with TTS, we find that segments with longer ACW-0 in the semantic time-series tend to contain more generic vocabulary, whereas segments with shorter ACW-0 are enriched in more specific words. These associations are strongly attenuated or abolished when word order and timing are randomized, indicating that ACW-based measures capture non-trivial temporal organization of semantic content beyond static lexical distributions. Our results suggest that ACW-based semantic timescales are a useful family of features for analyzing and comparing the temporal structure of human and AI-generated speech.
45 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables. Accepted manuscript; published in Computer Speech & Language
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Signal Processing (eess.SP)
arXiv:2606.11371 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.11371v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11371 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2026.102013 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 338 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · Sep 19, 2026

Building a Foundation Stack for General-Purpose Robots
IEEE Spectrum · Jul 13, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026