aiqbench analysis
This study reveals a significant "curse of knowledge" in role-playing language models, where characters frequently leak information they cannot perceive or hear during agent simulations and game scenarios. The research demonstrates that compliance is highly sensitive to input formatting and scene layout, with open-weight models showing substantial leakage rates compared to most proprietary counterparts. For developers building embodied agents, the findings underscore that strictly controlling model inputs to match character perception is critical for maintaining logical consistency and privacy boundaries.
The Curse of Knowledge in Role-Playing Language Models
arXiv:2610.17327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Role-playing language models speak as characters in games and agent simulations, where the system records what each character can hear, see and understand. We test whether characters respect these boundaries in 480 scenes, each with a counterfactual twin that changes only the hidden fact, so mentions of the twin's fact measure guessing. Across 11 open-weight models, characters use content from speech they cannot understand or hear at 67 and 72 percentage points (pp) above this baseline, although most models correctly state what the character perceives. This is a curse of knowledge. The leak extends to hidden actions and private messages and changes where characters search. Five of six proprietary models rarely leak, but compliance in strong models depends on input format. Changing only the scene layout or character description raises the rate in two otherwise compliant open-weight models from under 10 to over 60 pp, and combined changes raise two proprietary models from near zero to 13 and 21~pp. Writing the line as the scene's author leaks nearly as much as role-play, and thinking rarely helps. Giving models only what the character observes stops the leak without hiding what it may report.
Abstract:Role-playing language models speak as characters in games and agent simulations, where the system records what each character can hear, see and understand. We test whether characters respect these boundaries in 480 scenes, each with a counterfactual twin that changes only the hidden fact, so mentions of the twin's fact measure guessing. Across 11 open-weight models, characters use content from speech they cannot understand or hear at 67 and 72 percentage points (pp) above this baseline, although most models correctly state what the character perceives. This is a curse of knowledge. The leak extends to hidden actions and private messages and changes where characters search. Five of six proprietary models rarely leak, but compliance in strong models depends on input format. Changing only the scene layout or character description raises the rate in two otherwise compliant open-weight models from under 10 to over 60 pp, and combined changes raise two proprietary models from near zero to 13 and 21~pp. Writing the line as the scene's author leaks nearly as much as role-play, and thinking rarely helps. Giving models only what the character observes stops the leak without hiding what it may report.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.17327 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.17327v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17327 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words
Related coverage

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
Cognitive Enhancement: Rethinking the Necessity of Role-Playing for Large Language Models
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026