Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes the first convergence guarantees for the standard Adam optimizer when dealing with heavy-tailed noise, addressing a critical gap in understanding its robustness beyond idealized bounded-variance assumptions. The study reveals that while Adam converges to stationary points under these noisy conditions, it suffers from suboptimal iteration complexity unless specific domain constraints are applied. These theoretical findings offer essential insights for practitioners relying on Adam in modern deep learning scenarios where gradient distributions often exhibit heavy tails.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The Convergence Behavior of Adam under Heavy-Tailed Noise

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.27383v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form \emph{Adam} optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise. While several Adam variants are known to achieve optimal iteration complexity in bounded-variance nonconvex optimization, little is understood about their behavior when stochastic gradients admit only a bounded $p$-th central moment for some $p \in (1,2]$, a setting increasingly observed in modern deep learning. To address this gap, we generalize the recent online-to-nonconvex conversion framework to accommodate heavy-tailed martingale-difference noise. Building on this generalized framework, we develop a discounted regret analysis for Adam, without restrictive parameter coupling. Our results show that Adam converges to $(\rho,\epsilon)$-stationary points under heavy-tailed noise. However, it exhibits a suboptimal iteration complexity and $p$-dependent convergence, a suboptimality that persists even in the bounded-variance case ($p=2$). When the domain radius is known and used to control the online-learner output, a standard setup in related literature, the convergence rate improves to match the optimal complexity. These findings provide new theoretical insight into the robustness and limitations of Adam in heavy-tailed regimes.

Abstract:We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form \emph{Adam} optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise. While several Adam variants are known to achieve optimal iteration complexity in bounded-variance nonconvex optimization, little is understood about their behavior when stochastic gradients admit only a bounded $p$-th central moment for some $p \in (1,2]$, a setting increasingly observed in modern deep learning. To address this gap, we generalize the recent online-to-nonconvex conversion framework to accommodate heavy-tailed martingale-difference noise. Building on this generalized framework, we develop a discounted regret analysis for Adam, without restrictive parameter coupling. Our results show that Adam converges to $(\rho,\epsilon)$-stationary points under heavy-tailed noise. However, it exhibits a suboptimal iteration complexity and $p$-dependent convergence, a suboptimality that persists even in the bounded-variance case ($p=2$). When the domain radius is known and used to control the online-learner output, a standard setup in related literature, the convergence rate improves to match the optimal complexity. These findings provide new theoretical insight into the robustness and limitations of Adam in heavy-tailed regimes.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.27383 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.27383v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27383 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage